Outcome of treatment of pelvic ring fractures

                                   Outcome of treatment of pelvic ring  fractures

                                                     Dr KS Dhillon

Pelvic anatomy

The bony pelvis consists of the sacrum and coccyx posteriorly and two innominate bones laterally and anteriorly. The innominate bone (hip bone) consists of the iliac bone, ischial bone and the pubic bone which meet at and house the acetabulum. The two innominate bones articulate with the sacrum posteriorly via the sacroiliac joints and they meet anteriorly at pubic symphysis.
The sacrum is connected to axial skeleton superiorly and to the coccyx inferiorly. The innominate bone is connected to the lower limbs via the hip joint at the acetabulum. Hence the pelvis is able to transmit forces from the axial skeleton to the lower limbs.
Transmission of forces from the axial skeleton to the lower limbs is the primary function of the pelvis and its secondary function is to contain the pelvic organs.The concave iliac fossa, and pelvic floor muscles help support the pelvic organs.
A strong sacrospinous ligament which extends from the sacrum to the  ischial spine converts the sciatic notch into the greater sciatic foramen and lesser sciatic foramen. The lesser sciatic foramen lies between the sacrospinous ligament and the sacrotuberous which runs from the sacrum to the ischial tuberosity. Through the greater sciatic foramen passes the sciatic nerve and the piriformis muscle from the pelvis to the gluteal region. Through the lesser sciatic foramen passes the the tendon of the obturator internus, internal pudendal vessels, pudendal nerve and the nerve to the obturator internus.
The inguinal ligament extends from the anterior superior iliac spine to the pubic tubercle. Below the inguinal ligament the femoral nerve and the femoral vessels exit the pelvis to enter the thigh.
The obturator foramen lies below the acetabulum and is formed by the pubis and the ischial bones. It is covered by a membrane in the upper part of which there is an opening through which the obturator nerves and vessels exit the pelvis and into the thigh.                                  

Classification of pelvic fractures 

Fractures of the pelvis are often classified according to the classification by Young and Burgess (1) which is based predominantly on the mechanism
of injury and severity of pelvic fracture. An anteroposterior (AP) radiograph of the pelvis is the only investigation necessary for this classification.
According to this classification the fractures are divided into four categories based on the mechanism of injury. Two of the categories are further subdivided according to the severity of injury .

1.Anterior posterior compression fractures– These fractures result from a direct or indirect force in an anteroposterior direction leading to a diastasis of the symphysis pubis, with or without obvious diastasis of the sacroiliac joint or fracture of the iliac bone.

These fractures are subdivided into three grades.
Grade 1: Pubic diastasis with no or slight widening of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). The SIJ ligaments remain intact.
Grade 2: Pubic diastasis with widening of SIJ and disruption of anterior ligaments and intact posterior ligaments.
Grade 3:  Pubic diastasis with complete SIJ disruption and torn anterior and posterior ligament but no vertical displacement of the hemipelvis.

2.Lateral compression fractures– These fractures result from lateral compression forces, which cause rotation of the pelvis inwards, leading to fractures in the sacroiliac region and pubic rami.

These fractures are subdivided into three grades.
Grade 1:Anterior transverse fracture of rami plus ipsilateral sacral compression fracture.
Grade 2: Anterior transverse fracture of rami plus ipsilateral sacral compression fracture and a fracture of the iliac wing.
Grade 3:Plus -Anterior transverse fracture of rami plus ipsilateral sacral compression fracture and a fracture of the iliac wing with a contralateral anterior posterior compression injury.

3.Vertical shear fractures–These fractures result from an axial shear force which disrupts the pubis symphysis and the SIJ and results in a vertical cephalic displacement of the hemipelvis.

4.Combined mechanism fractures– These fractures results from a combination of two of the above vector. The fracture pattern would be a combination of one or more of the above fracture types.

The presences of a displacement of the posterior sacroiliac complex by a fracture, dislocation or both and an avulsion fracture of the transverse processes of the lower lumbar vertebrae on plain AP radiographs of the pelvis is suggestive of pelvic instability (2). An inlet view is most useful for assessing rotational displacement/instability and an outlet view is most useful for vertical displacement/instability.

Outcome of treatment

Mortality

In the past hemorrhage was the cause of death in about two third of the patients who presented with pelvic fractures (3). Now, however the death from hemorrhage has been reduced with about one third of patients with pelvic fractures dying from hemorrhage (4). When there is major haemodynamic instability the mortality rates can reach as high as 40% to 80% (5,6). Presently the mortality rate in hemodynamically unstable patients with fractures of the pelvis remains at about 30% (7). The overall mortality varies between 10% (8) to 20% (9).
Besides hemorrhage which causes early mortality, sepsis with multiorgan failure can be the cause of late mortality in some patients with pelvic fractures (10).

Functional outcome

Unfortunately there are no ‘standard disease-specific functional outcome instruments’ that can be used to report functional outcome after pelvic fractures (11). Lefaivre et al (11) did a systematic review of literature to evaluate the ‘use and interpretation of generic and disease-specific functional outcome instruments in the reporting of outcome after the surgical treatment of disruptions of the pelvic ring’.They found that the ‘existing literature in this area is inadequate to inform surgeons or patients in a meaningful way about the functional outcomes of these fractures after fixation’.
Some of the commonly used scores used to report functional outcome after pelvic fractures include,Majeed score, the Iowa Pelvic Score, and the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36).
The Majeed score (12) is a functional assessment for patients with pelvic fractures which assess five factors which are then scored to provide a clinical grade of excellent, good, fair and poor. The five factors are pain, standing, sitting, sexual intercourse and work performance. More than 85 points is excellent, 70 to 84 is good, 55 to 69 is fair and below 55 is poor outcome.
 The Iowa Pelvic Score assess, activities of daily life, work history, pain, limping,visual pain line and cosmesis. The SF-36 on the other hand is a general health assessment which assess physical functioning,  bodily pain and general health (2).
Suzuki et al (13) used the above scores to report the long term functional outcome after unstable pelvic ring fractures. They studied 57 patients (28 male and 29 female) with an average of 42.4 years who had unstable pelvic ring fractures. The average follow-up was 47.2 months (minimum 2 years). The average Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 24.6 points.Twenty-three of the patients were treated conservatively, 22 had external fixation, and 12 had  internal fixation of the fractures.
The average Majeed score was 79.7 and the average IPS was 80.7. The average ‘physical component summary of the SF-36 was 13.4 points worse than that of the population norm’. Radiological examination showed ‘average residual displacement was 7.3 mm anteriorly and 5.2 mm posteriorly’. They also found that the ‘Majeed score and the physical component summary of the SF-36 correlated with the presence of neurologic injury, and the Iowa Pelvic Score correlated with the presence of a mental disorder, posterior displacement, and neurologic injury’.
The authors concluded that Injury severity Score, fracture location and type of fracture did not influence the long term functional outcome in patients with unstable pelvic ring fractures. They found a close correlation between neurological injury and functional outcome.
Dienstknecht et al (14) reported the functional and socioeconomic long-term outcome in 109 patients with pelvic ring injuries at a minimum of 10 years follow up. The average age of the patients was 28.8 years (5 to 55) and the mean ISS was 22.7. They found that 39% of the patients had a limp, 11% required crutches and 15% of the patients had restrictions in use of car or public transport usage. Overall the outcome was worse in patients with isolated posterior and combined anterior posterior fractures as compared to isolated anterior fractures.
Papakostidis et al (15) did a systematic review of literature to compare the outcome of treatment of pelvic ring fractures by conservative means,  anterior stabilization,and posterior stabilization. They found no difference between the group as far as the incidence of severe pain, return to previous employment, functional scoring systems, or general health and wellbeing outcomes were concerned. A better walking ability was seen among patients who had surgical stabilization of the fractures. Less malunions were seen in patients who had internal fixation of posterior fractures. The relationship between quality of reduction of the fractures and the long-term functional outcomes remains unresolved.

Sexual dysfunction

Sexual dysfunction can present in various forms and includes erectile dysfunction (ED), dyspareunia, loss of sensation, ejaculatory dysfunction, and restricted motion during intercourse (16). Metze et al (16) in retrospective review studied the incidence of male sexual dysfunction after pelvic fractures. Sixty one percent of the patients reported limitations in sexual function and persistent erectile dysfunction was found in 19% of the patients.Posterior ring disruptions appeared to increase the risk of persistent erectile problems, probably due to nerve injury.
In literature the overall mean reported incidence of sexual dysfunction after pelvic fractures is 35.9% in men and 39.6% in women.There is limited consensus  on the definition of sexual dysfunction,and on the methods and timing of assessment, as well as on its management (17).

Urological injury

Urologic injuries commonly associated with pelvic fractures include injuries of the urethra, corpora cavernosa (penis), bladder, and bladder neck (18). Injuries to the urinary bladder usually result from shearing force or direct laceration by bone fragments and usually extraperitoneal. Urethral disruption can lead to urethral strictures, incontinence, and impotence. The impotence associated with pelvic fractures is usually of vascular origin and not due to neurologic injury. The management of urethral injury associated with pelvic fractures remain controversial. Some believe in early primary realignment is carried out (18).
There are others who believe that primary suturing of the disrupted urethral ends has the greatest complication rates of incontinence (21%) and impotence (56%), as compared to suprapubic cystostomy and delayed repair (19).

Neurologic injury

Reilly et al (20) did a clinical review of 90 unstable pelvic fractures treated during a 3-year period. Of these 90 patients, 83 were available for follow up examination. They found neurologic injuries in 21 % of the patients. Sensory deficit alone was present in 37% of the patients and the rest (63%) had both sensory and motor deficit. Some neurologic improvement was seen in all patients at one year follow up. Fifty three percent of the patients showed full recovery. Improvement in function took about one year in most instances but they found that L5 function was least likely to recover fully.

Venous thromboembolism

In patients with pelvic fractures the incidence of proximal vein thrombosis is between 25% to 35% with symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) occurring in 2% to 10% of the patients, and fatal PE in 0.5% to 2% of the patients (21).
Sharma et al (22) studied the incidence of deep vein, in 507 patients with at least one risk factor for venous thromboembolism, using venous duplex scans. They found that that the highest incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was seen in patients with pelvic fractures, in patients with previous venous thromboembolism, spinal cord injury and significant head injury (AIS > 2). They also found that deep-vein thrombosis was asymptomatic in 68% of patients and pulmonary embolism (PE)  was silent in 63% of the patients.
Steele et al (23) studied the efficacy low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in the prevention of thromboembolism in patient with pelvic and acetabular trauma. They reported a 10% overall incidence of proximal DVT and a 5%  incidence of pulmonary embolism. They found that patients who received  LMWH within 24 hours of injury had a 3% incidence of DVT and incidence rose to 22% in patients who had who received LMWH more than 24 hours after the injury. There were ten patients who developed a proximal DVT and
five had a symptomatic PE, one of which was fatal. They recommended the use of LMWH within 24 hours in patients with pelvic and acetabular trauma.
Barrera et al (24) did a systematic review of literature for the Cochrane group to evaluate the role of thromboprophylaxis in trauma patients. They found no evidence that thromboprophylaxis reduces mortality or PE. However there was some evidence that thromboprophylaxis prevents DVT.

References

1. Burgess AR, Eastridge BJ, Young JW, et al. Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols. J Trauma 1990;30:848-56.
2. Guthrie HC, Owens RW, Bircher MD.Fractures of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B:1481-8.
3. Rothenberger DA, Fischer RP, Strate RG, Velasco R, Perry JF., Jr The mortality associated with pelvic fractures. Surgery. 1978;84:356–361.
4. Perkins ZB, Maytham GD, Koers L, Bates P, Brohi K, Tai NR. Impact on outcome of a targeted performance improvement programme in hemodynamically unstable patients with a pelvic fracture. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(8):1090–1097.
5. Smejkal R, Izant T, Born C, Delong W, Schwab W, Ross SE. Pelvic crush injuries with occlusion of the iliac artery. J Trauma. 1988;28:1479–1482. 
6. Mucha P, Jr, Welch TJ. Hemorrhage in major pelvic fractures. Surg Clin North Am. 1988;68:757–773.
7. Burlew CC, Moore EE, Stahel PF, Geddes AE, Wagenaar AE, Pieracci FM, MD, Fox CJ, Campion EM, Johnson JL and Mauffrey C. Preperitoneal pelvic packing reduces mortality in patients with life-threatening hemorrhage due to unstable pelvic fractures.J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2017 (82), (2): 233-242.
8. Dyer GS, Vrahas MS. Review of the pathophysiology and acute management of haemorrhage in pelvic fracture. Injury 2006;37:602-13.
9. Geeraerts T, Chhor V, Cheisson G, Martin L, Bessoud B, Ozanne A, Duranteau J. Review of the pathophysiology and acute management of haemorrhage in pelvic fracture. Injury. 2006 Jul;37(7):602-13. Epub 2005 Nov 23.
10. Kataoka Y, Minehara H, Shimada K, et al. Sepsis caused by peripelvic soft tissue infections in critically injured patients with multiple injuries and unstable pelvic fracture. J Trauma 2009;66:1548-54.
11. Lefaivre KA1, Slobogean GP, Valeriote J, O'Brien PJ, Macadam SA. Reporting and interpretation of the functional outcomes after the surgical treatment of disruptions of the pelvic ring: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Apr;94(4):549-55.
12. Majeed SA. Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1989;71-B: 304-6.
13. Suzuki T, Shindo M, Soma K, Minehara H, Nakamura K, Uchino M, Itoman M. Long-term functional outcome after unstable pelvic ring fracture. J Trauma. 2007 Oct;63(4):884-8.
14. T. Dienstknecht, R. Pfeifer, K. Horst, R. M. Sellei, A. Berner, B. A. Zelle, C. Probst, H-C. Pape. The long-term clinical outcome after pelvic ring injuries. Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:548–53.
15. Papakostidis C., Giannoudis P.V. Pelvic ring injuries with haemodynamic instability: efficacy of pelvic packing, a systematic review. Injury. 2009;40(suppl 4):S53–S61.
16. Metze M., Tiemann A.H., Josten C. Male sexual dysfunction after pelvic fracture. J Trauma. 2007;63(2):394–401.
17. Harvey-Kelly KF1, Kanakaris NK, Eardley I, Giannoudis PV. Sexual function impairment after high energy pelvic fractures: evidence today. J Urol. 2011 Jun;185(6):2027-34.
18. Brandes S, Borrelli J Jr. Pelvic fracture and associated urologic injuries. World J Surg 2001; 25:1578-87.
19. Koraitim MM. Pelvic fracture urethral injuries: the unresolved controversy. J Urol. 1999 May;161(5):1433-41.
20. Reilly MC1, Zinar DM, Matta JM. Neurologic injuries in pelvic ring fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Aug;(329):28-36.
21. Montgomery KD, Geerts WH, Potter HG, Helfet DL. Thromboembolic complications in patients with pelvic trauma. Clin Orthop 1996;329:68-87.
22. Sharma OP1, Oswanski MF, Joseph RJ, Tonui P, Westrick L, Raj SS, Tatchell T, Waite PJ, Gandaio A. Venous thromboembolism in trauma patients. Am Surg. 2007 Nov;73(11):1173-80.
23. Steele N, Dodenhoff RM, Ward AJ, Morse MH. Thromboprophylaxis in pelvic and acetabular trauma surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:209-12.
24. Barrera LM, Perel P, Ker K, Cirocchi R, Farinella E, Morales Uribe CH. Thromboprophylaxis for trauma patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;(3):CD008303

What is the clinical relevance of a tear of the knee meniscus? Has surgery any role in its treatment?

                        What is the clinical relevance of a tear of the knee meniscus?
                                       Has surgery any role in its treatment?     

                                                                 Dr KS DHILLON

 

Anatomy of the meniscus

Each knee joint has two wedge shaped semilunar fibrocartilages. The one between the lateral femoral and tibial condyles is called the lateral meniscus and the one between  the medial femoral and tibial condyle is called the medial meniscus. The meniscus consists of the body, anterior and posterior horns and the insertional ligaments. Anteriorly and posteriorly the meniscus is attached to the tibia plateau via the insertional ligaments. The menisci are approximately 35 mm in diameter and about 110 mm in length at its outer convex border where it is attached to the capsule (1). The anterior horns of both menisci are narrower as compared to posterior horn. The lateral meniscus covers about 80% of the lateral tibial plateau and the medial meniscus covers about 60% of the medial tibial plateau (1). 

The menisci provide articular congruency between semicircular shaped

femoral condyles and the relatively flat tibial plateau. The menisci significantly increase the contact area in the femorotibial articulation and hence they reduce the stresses

on tibial cartilage (1). The menisci bear about 40% to 70% of the load transmitted across the knee joint (2). This load bearing function is possible because of the strong anterior and posterior attachment of the menisci to the tibial plateau. This strong attachment prevents the menisci from dislodging from the joint when there is axial loading. 

A total meniscectomy will remove the stress distribution function of the meniscus leading to increased stresses on the tibial articular surface, which will subsequently lead to  osteochondral changes. In fact a radial transection through the meniscal body or a transection of insertional ligaments completely disables the load distribution function of

the meniscus and has the same functional effect as a total meniscectomy (1). The meniscus can still transmit significant loads when the central segment of the meniscus is removed provided that the peripheral circumferential fibres and insertional ligaments are intact (3).

Besides stress distribution, menisci are also believed to play significant roles in

shock absorption (4 and 5), joint stabilisation (6) and joint lubrication (7).

Day et al (8) studied the neurovascular supply of the meniscus. They found that the nerve supply follows the vascular pattern. The medial and lateral inferior and middle geniculate arteries supply blood to the perimeniscal plexus from which radial branches enter the meniscus at intervals. More blood flows to the anterior and posterior horns and less to the body of the meniscus. The body of the meniscus receives blood in its peripheral third only. Two thirds of the body is avascular along with an area close to popliteus tendon which is also avascular. Nerves are present in areas where there is blood flow to the meniscus.Most notably nerves are found anterior horn, posterior horn and the outer third of the body. However Zimny et al (9) showed the presence of neural elements in the middle third of the medial meniscus obtained at autopsy.There were no neural elements in the inner third.

Mine et al (10) studied the innervation of the medial and lateral menisci which were obtained from patients undergoing arthroplasty. They found that nerve fibre and sensory receptors were mainly found in the vascular outer third of the body and in the anterior and posterior horns. They found that nerve fibres positive for substance P were detected in the menisci but fewer in number. Their study showed that some pain in patients with meniscal tear could arise from the meniscus especial in peripheral tears which are associated with bleeding.

Three types of mechanoreceptors are found in the meniscus and these include Ruffini endings, Pacinian corpuscles, and Golgi tendon organs. They function as transducers which convert  physical stimuli of tension and compression into electrical nerve impulses (11).

Types of meniscal tears

Tears of the meniscus are broadly divided into 3 types: Basic, complex and displaced tears (12 and 13).

A.Basic tears

The basic tears are divided into 3 types:

1.Longitudinal tears

  Longitudinally oriented tears includes (a) horizontal tear and (b) longitudinal tear

A horizontal tear is also known as a cleavage tear and the tear is oriented horizontally parallel to the tibial plateau. It usually a degenerative tear which is seen in older individuals. It is commonly associated with a meniscal cyst. 

A longitudinal tear is also known as a vertical tear and it occurs perpendicular to the tibial plateau, along the long axis of the meniscus and parallel to the circumference of the meniscus. It most often involves the posterior horn of the meniscus. Such tears are often seen in young individuals following significant trauma.

 

2. Radial tears

 Radial tears extend radially from the free end of the meniscus to the periphery and are vertical to the tibial plateau. Such tears weaken the meniscus resulting in loss of function. They are commonly seen at the posterior horn of the medial meniscus and at the junction of the anterior horn and body of the lateral meniscus.

3.Meniscal root tears

Meniscal root tears (MRTs) are avulsion injuries or radial tears of the meniscal root insertion at tibial plateau. Such injuries are known to affect the function of the meniscus (14,15,16).

B.Complex tears

The complex tears of the meniscus are a combination of all or two of the following;  longitudinal,horizontal and radial-type tears.

 

C.Displaced tears

Displaced tears are those where the torn component is displaced but is either still attached to the parent meniscus or detached. There are 3 types of displaced tears:

Flap tears; where a horizontal or longitudinal tear is displaced.

Bucket-handle tear’ where a larger segment of a longitudinal tear is displaced.

Parrot beak tear is a displaced radial tear.

 

Etiology of meniscus tears

Tears of meniscus can be of three types, namely, traumatic, degenerative and iatrogenic. Traumatic tears usually result from sports related activities especially in young males. Degenerative tears are seen in older individuals after the age of 55 years. Iatrogenic injuries to the anterior meniscal roots occur during tibial tunnel reaming during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (17,18).

 

Traumatic tears result from a rotational varus or valgus force placed on a flexed knee. The medial meniscus is usually injured when the femur internally rotates and a valgus force is applied to the when the foot is fixed on the ground. A lateral meniscus tear usually results from a varus force on a flexed knee and the the femur rotates externally.

 

Degenerative tears are common and are due to degeneration of the meniscus which occurs with aging in older individuals. The tears are usually horizontal, oblique or complex (19).Bhattacharyya et al (20) carried out a Level I-1 study to assess the prevalence and clinical relevance of meniscal tears in individuals with OA of the knee using  MRIs of the knee. They found that in asymptomatic subjects with a mean age of 65 years, a tear was found in 76% of the  subjects, whereas in patients with symptomatic knee OA, a meniscal tear was found in 91% of the individuals.They concluded that meniscal tears are very common in both symptomatic and asymptomatic older individuals with OA of the knee. They also found that meniscal tears do not produce more pain in osteoarthritic knees as compared to osteoarthritic  knees with no tear of the meniscus. The meniscal tears in osteoarthritic knees do not affect the functional status of the individuals. The authors also that ‘these data do not support the routine use of magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation and management of meniscal tears in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee’. 

It had been estimated in 2006  that some 30 million individuals in the USA over the age of 65 would have a meniscal tear (21)

Englund et al (22) did a population based study to assess the prevalence of meniscal tears in the general population and also to see the association of these tears with knee symptoms and with radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis.They found that the prevalence of a meniscal damage in the knee ranged from 19% in women between 50 to 59 years of age to 56% in men aged between 70 to 90 years of age.The overall prevalence of meniscal tears in the population was 35%. The prevalence of meniscus destruction was 10%. 

In individuals with evidence of OA the prevalence of tears was 63% in those who had knee symptoms ( knee pain, aching, or stiffness on most days) and 60% in those who had no symptoms. In individuals with no OA the prevalence of tears was 32% (with symptoms) and 23% (no symptoms) respectively.  Sixty-one percent of individuals with meniscal tears had no symptoms in the previous month.

They concluded that incidental findings of meniscal tears on MRI of the knee in the general population are common and that the incidence increases with age.

The etiology of degenerative meniscal tears of the knee is not known. Englund et al (23) in another study showed that meniscal tears in the knee are part of generalised osteoarthritic process. They did a study to see if radiographic hand OA is associated with meniscal damage in the knee. They found that the prevalence of meniscus damage in the knee increased with the number of fingers with OA.When 3 or more fingers had OA, the incidence of meniscal damage was 47.2%.Absence of OA in the knee did alter the prevalence rates. The authors concluded that the results suggest ‘a common non-age related etiologic pathway for both radiographic hand OA and meniscus damage’.

Treatment of meniscus tears

The treatment of meniscal injuries is controversial, partly because we know little about symptoms produced by meniscal tears. We know that many individuals with meniscal damage have no symptoms (20). We know that bucket handle tears of the meniscus do produce definite symptoms which are characteristic of such a tear. They produce locking of the knee, pain and sometimes giving way of the knee. Only in about 38% of patients with bucket handle tears, the tear is caused by definite trauma, 40% of such tears are caused by simple twist of the knee and in 20% there is no history of knee injury (24).  This probably means that significant numbers bucket handle tears are due to degeneration of the meniscus.The treatment of mechanical symptoms in patients with meniscal tears is controversial. However in certain individuals who present with locked knee after trauma the treatment is usually surgical.

The treatment of all other meniscal tears remains controversial. More and more data is becoming available which shows that there is no role of partial meniscectomy in the treatment of meniscal tears which are not producing mechanical symptoms. 

Sihvonen et al (25) carried out an excellent multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in 146 patients between the ages of 35 to 65 years who had no osteoarthritis of the knee but had knee symptoms consistent with a degenerative medial meniscus tear. The patients were randomly assigned to sham surgery or arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. The Lysholm score, WOMET score and score for knee pain after exercise were similar in the two groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups as far as rates for subsequent knee surgery were concerned.

Sihvonen et al (26) published a 2 years follow up of the patients in the study they published earlier in 2013 (25). The results were similar to the once in the earlier study. They found that the results of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) were not better than that of placebo surgery at 2 years follow up in patients with a degenerative meniscal tear and no knee osteoarthritis. They concluded that the results ‘support the evolving consensus that degenerative meniscus tear represents an (early) sign of knee osteoarthritis, rather than a clinical entity on its own’. They were of the opinion that patients with knee pain and suspected degenerative meniscal tears need not be sent for an MRI or APM even after failure of conservative treatment.

Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is often used to treat mechanical symptoms due to meniscal tears. Sihvonen et al (27) in another study showed that resection of a torn meniscus by surgery has no added benefit over sham surgery in relieving mechanical symptoms such as knee catching or occasional locking. The mechanical symptoms may not likely be caused by the tear but may be due to the underlying degenerative joint disease.

Kise et al (28) carried out a randomised controlled superiority trial to determine if exercise therapy was superior to arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for knee function in

middle aged patients with degenerative meniscal tears. The study included 140 adults with a mean age of 49.5 years (range 35.7-59.9) who had degenerative medial meniscal tear which was verified by magnetic resonance imaging. Ninety-six percent of the patients had no definitive radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis. They divided the patients into two group. One group had 12 weeks of supervised physical therapy alone and the other group had arthroscopic partial meniscectomy alone. The patients were followed up for 2 years. They found no clinically relevant difference in the KOOS score  between the two groups at two years.

Khan et al (29) did a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopic meniscal débridement as compared to non-operative or sham operation in patients who had knee pain and had mild or no  osteoarthritis of the knee. They found that there is moderate evidence to suggest that arthroscopic meniscus debridement for degenerative meniscal tears is not superior to nonoperative or sham treatments in middle-aged patients with mild or no concomitant osteoarthritis. 

There is general belief that patients with traumatic meniscal tears do better than patients with degenerative tears after partial meniscectomy. Thorlund et al (30) did a comparative prospective cohort study of 397 adults with traumatic or degenerative tears of the meniscus who underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. The age range from 18 to 55 years with a mean age of 38.7 years. Forty two percent of the subjects were females. They were followed up for 52 weeks and at which time 14% of the patients were lost to follow up.

They found that the group with degenerative tears had better functional outcome as measured with KOOS scores compared to the traumatic tear group.However, there was no meaningful clinical difference between the groups at any time in the study. This study debunked long held belief that ‘patients with traumatic meniscal tears experience greater improvements in patient reported outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy than patients with degenerative tears’ (30).

Since, now that there is level I, sound, irrefutable, robust  evidence that arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is of no benefit to patients with degenerative meniscal tears, such surgery should not be recommended to patients with degenerative tears. 

Should partial meniscectomy be carried out in patients with traumatic tears which are not producing mechanical symptoms such as locking of the knee? Since evidence shows that the outcome after partial meniscectomy for degenerative and traumatic tears is the same, then most likely partial meniscectomy for traumatic tears will also be of no therapeutic value to patients.

Meniscal repairs are often recommended because of the believe that loss of meniscal function leads to osteoarthritis of the knee.Sommerlath and Gillquist (31) compared the functional results of meniscus repair and total meniscectomy in patients with meniscal tears in the vascular zone, with or without intact anterior cruciate ligament. They found that at 7-year follow-up, the functional outcome was similar in patient who had total meniscectomy or a repair of the meniscus.

 Rockborn and  Messner (32) studied the long term outcome of meniscectomy versus a meniscal repair in patients with meniscal tears.At the 13-year follow-up they found no difference between the groups in knee function, subjective complaints, or manual findings. Ninety percent of the patients in both groups had no knee problems during daily activities. They also found that at 13 years follow up the incidence and severity  of OA did not significantly differ in the two groups even when only the successful repairs were compared to meniscectomy.

 

Conclusion

The function of the knee meniscus is to distribute stress, absorb shock, provide joint stability and promote joint lubrication. Forty to seventy percent of the load that passess through the knee is borne by the meniscus. When the function of the meniscus is lost due to damage or excision of the meniscus, loads across the joint lead to osteochondral damage.

The outer third of the meniscus has neurovascular supply. Tears in the outer third can heal due to the vascularity and it forms the basis for meniscal repair. Some nerve endings have been found in the middle third. The nerve supply provides mechanoreceptor and some nocioreceptor function. 

Tears of the menisci occur due to either trauma or due to degeneration of the menisci which is part of the degenerative process of the knee joint. Degenerative tears can be symptomatic or asymptomatic. A significant portion of the population have asymptomatic tears of the menisci. In asymptomatic individuals with mean age of 65 years who has OA of the knee, the incidence of meniscal tears is about 76% and 91% in individuals with symptomatic knee OA. The incidence pain is not more in patients with knee OA who have a torn meniscus as compared to those with no tear. The presence of a torn meniscus in patients with knee OA is of no significance. 

In the past the treatment of meniscal tears have been surgical, in the form of arthroscopic meniscectomy or a meniscal repair. However, now there is very robust level I evidence that arthroscopic partial meniscectomy has no role in the treatment of degenerative tears of the meniscus even when there are mechanical symptoms. The outcome of partial meniscectomy in traumatic and degenerative meniscal tears is the same. Hence it is unlikely that patients with traumatic meniscal tears will benefit from a partial meniscectomy. The only exception maybe a patient who presents with a locked knee after trauma.

The long term outcome of meniscal repairs and meniscectomy is the same in terms of function and onset and severity of osteoarthritis. There appears to be no role of a meniscal repair in the treatment of meniscal tears. 

There appears to no basis for a recommendation of surgery for the treatment of meniscal tears of the knee except for in patients with post-traumatic locked knees.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

1. Messner K and Gao J. The menisci of the knee joint. Anatomical and functional characteristics, and a rationale for clinical treatment.J Anat. 1998 Aug; 193(Pt 2): 161–178.
2. Walker PS, Erkman MJ. The role of the menisci in force transmission across the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;(109):184-92.
3.  Burke DL, Ahmed AH, Miller J.  A biomechanical study of partial and total medial meniscectomy of the knee. Transaction of the Orthopaedic Research Society. 1978: 3, 91.
4. Seedhom BB, Hargreaves DJ (1979) Transmission of the load in the knee joint with special reference to the role of the menisci.Part II: Experimental results, discussion and conclusions.Engineering in Medicine 4, 220–228.
5. Voloshin AS, Wosk J. Shock absorption of meniscectomized and painful knees: a comparative in vivo study. Journal of Biomedical Engineering 5,1983: 157–161.
6. Shoemaker SC, Markolf KL. The role of the meniscus in the anterior-posterior stability of the loaded anterior cruciate deficient knee. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1986: 68A, 71–79.
7. MacConaill MA. The function of intra-articular fibrocartilages, with special reference to the knee and inferior radioulnar joints. Journal of Anatomy. 1932: 66, 210.
8. Day B, Mackenzie WG, Shim SS, Leung G. The vascular and nerve supply of the human meniscus. Arthroscopy. 1985;1(1):58–62.
9. Zimny ML, Albright DJ, Dabezies E. Mechanoreceptors in the human medial meniscus. Acta Anat. 1988;133:35-40.
10. Mine T, Kimura M, Sakka A, Kawai S. Innervation of nociceptors in the menisci of the knee joint: an immunohistochemical study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120(3-4):201-4.
11. Alice J. S. Fox, Asheesh Bedi, Scott A. Rodeo. The Basic Science of Human Knee Menisci: Structure, Composition, and Function. Sports Health. 2012 Jul; 4(4): 340–351. doi: 10.1177/1941738111429419.
12. Nguyen JC, De Smet AA, Graf BK et-al. MR imaging-based diagnosis and classification of meniscal tears. Radiographics. 2014;34 (4): 981-99.
13. De Smet AA. How I diagnose meniscal tears on knee MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199 (3): 481-99.
14. LaPrade CM, James EW, Cram TR, Feagin JA, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF. Meniscal root tears: a classification system based on tear morphology.Am J Sports Med. 2015 Feb;43(2):363-9.
15. Matheny LM, Ockuly AC, Steadman JR, LaPrade RF. Posterior meniscus root tears: associated pathologies to assist as diagnostic tools. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Oct;23(10):3127-31.
16. Bhatia S, LaPrade CM, Ellman MB, LaPrade RF.Meniscal root tears: significance, diagnosis, and treatment.Am J Sports Med. 2014 Dec;42(12):3016-30.
17. Watson JN, Wilson KJ, LaPrade CM, Kennedy NI, Campbell KJ, Hutchinson MR, Wijdicks CA, LaPrade RF. Iatrogenic injury of the anterior meniscal root attachments following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tunnel reaming.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Aug;23(8):2360-6.
18. LaPrade CM, Smith SD, Rasmussen MT, Hamming MG, Wijdicks CA, Engebretsen L, Feagin JA, LaPrade RF.Consequences of tibial tunnel reaming on the meniscal roots during cruciate ligament reconstruction in a cadaveric model, Part 1: The anterior cruciate ligament.Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):200-6.
19. Poehling GG, Ruch DS, Chabon SJ. The landscape of meniscal injuries. Clin Sports Med. 1990 Jul;9(3):539-49.
20. Bhattacharyya T1, Gale D, Dewire P, Totterman S, Gale ME, McLaughlin S, Einhorn TA, Felson DT.The clinical importance of meniscal tears demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging in osteoarthritis of the knee.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan;85-A(1):4-9.
21. Englund and Lohmander.Meniscectomy and osteoarthritis: what is the cause and what is the effect? Future Rheumatol. (2006) 1(2), 207–215.
22. Englund M, Guermazi A, Gale D, Hunter DJ, Aliabadi P, Clancy M, Felson DT. Incidental meniscal findings on knee MRI in middle-aged and elderly persons.N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 11;359(11):1108-15.
23. Englund M, Haugen IK, Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Niu J, Neogi T, Aliabadi P, Felson DT.Evidence that meniscus damage may be a component of osteoarthritis: the Framingham study.Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016 Feb;24(2):270-3.
24. Shakespeare DT, Rigby HS.The bucket-handle tear of the meniscus. A clinical and arthrographic study.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983 Aug;65(4):383-7.
25. Sihvonen R, Paavola M, Malmivaara A, Itälä A, Joukainen A, Nurmi H, Kalske J, Järvinen TL; Finnish Degenerative Meniscal Lesion Study (FIDELITY) Group.Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus sham surgery for a degenerative meniscal tear.N Engl J Med. 2013 Dec 26;369(26):2515-24.
26. Sihvonen R, Paavola M, Malmivaara A, Itälä A, Joukainen A, Nurmi H, Kalske J, Ikonen A, Järvelä T, Järvinen TA, Kanto K, Karhunen J, Knifsund J, Kröger H, Kääriäinen T, Lehtinen J, Nyrhinen J, Paloneva J, Päiväniemi O, Raivio M, Sahlman J, Sarvilinna R, Tukiainen S, Välimäki VV, Äärimaa V, Toivonen P, Järvinen TL; FIDELITY (Finnish Degenerative Meniscal Lesion Study) Investigators.Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus placebo surgery for a degenerative meniscus tear: a 2-year follow-up of the randomised controlled trial.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Published Online First: 18 May 2017. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211172.
27. Sihvonen R, Englund M, Turkiewicz A, Järvinen TL; Finnish Degenerative Meniscal Lesion Study Group.Mechanical Symptoms and Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy in Patients With Degenerative Meniscus Tear: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.Ann Intern Med. 2016 Apr 5;164(7):449-55.
28. Kise NJ, Risberg MA, Stensrud S, Ranstam J, Engebretsen L, Roos EM. Exercise therapy versus arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for degenerative meniscal tear in middle aged patients: randomised controlled trial with two year follow-up.BMJ. 2016 Jul 20;354:i 3740. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i 3740.
29. Khan M, Evaniew N, Bedi A, Ayeni OR, Bhandari M. Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative tears of the meniscus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CMAJ October 7, 2014 vol. 186 no. 14 1057-1064.
30. Thorlund JB, Englund M, Christensen R, Nissen N, Pihl K, Jørgensen U, Schjerning J, Lohmander LS. Patient reported outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for traumatic or degenerative meniscal tears: comparative prospective cohort study.BMJ. 2017 Feb 2;356:j356. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j356.
31. Sommerlath K, Gillquist J. Knee function after meniscus repair and total meniscectomy--a 7-year follow-up study.Arthroscopy. 1987;3(3):166-9.
32. Rockborn P, Messner K. Long-term results of meniscus repair and meniscectomy: a 13-year functional and radiographic follow-up study.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8(1):2-10.