Monday, 28 November 2022

     Polymyositis


                                 Dr. KS Dhillon


Introduction

There are four major subtypes of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. These include dermatomyositis, polymyositis, inclusion body myositis, and necrotizing myopathy. Bohan and Peter [1] categorized myopathies into seven classes. Polymyositis is an autoimmune and chronic inflammatory myopathy. It is characterized by symmetrical proximal muscle weakness due to the involvement of endomysial layers of skeletal muscles. Dermatomyositis, on the other hand, involves the perimysial layers of muscles along with dermatological involvement [2]. 

Polymyositis develops over the months. Inclusion body myositis (IBM), on the other hand, is a slowly progressive chronic myopathy that develops in older individuals over a period of months to years and the symptoms are more severe. Inclusion body myositis develops secondary to either an autoimmune reaction or due to a degenerative process that results from persistent retroviral infection such as human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) [3]. Since polymyositis is an autoimmune rheumatological disorder, it requires long-term treatment with steroids or immunomodulators. At the same time treatment of the underlying etiological factors is carried out. 


Etiology

Polymyositis is an autoimmune disorder. It develops due to abnormal activation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CD8 cells) and macrophages against muscular antigens. There is strong extrafusal muscular expression of major histocompatibility complex 1 causing damage to the endomysium of skeletal muscles [4,5].


Rhabdomyolysis is produced by different cytokines, including interleukins, and tumor necrosis factor. It occurs in individuals who are already suffering from some kind of systematic disease due to viral infections, malignancies, or other autoimmune disorders. 

The viruses that commonly cause polymyositis are the retroviruses human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and HTLV1, and hepatitis C virus. They cause inflammatory muscle degeneration by causing endomysial damage leading to edematous swelling and nodular mass formation in the myocytes [6,7].

Coxsackie B virus can also produce polymyositis. This autoimmune disorder is due to the abnormal functioning of the major histocompatibility complex secondary to the release of cytokines that damage the intima and endothelium of blood vessels [8].

Malignancies such as lung carcinoma, genitourinary malignancy or lymphomas, etc can also cause polymyositis-induced rhabdomyolysis. The presence of polymyositis also increases the possibility of developing carcinoma in 2-5 years after the diagnosis, especially non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Lung carcinoma and bladder carcinomas can often develop [9].

Other causes of polymyositis include:

  • The presence of certain HLA variants (A1, B8, DR3)

  • The presence of another autoimmune disease such as celiac disease [10]

  • The use of few medications such as hydralazine, procainamide, antiepileptics, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors due to their ability to act as a hapten. There was a study that reported that 24% of patients on statin therapy developed polymyositis [11].

Bohan and Peter classified the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies as follows [12]:

I - Primary idiopathic polymyositis

II - Primary idiopathic dermatomyositis

III - Polymyositis or dermatomyositis associated with malignancy [13]

IV - Childhood polymyositis or dermatomyositis

V - Polymyositis or dermatomyositis associated with another connective tissue disease

VI - Miscellaneous eg, eosinophilic myositis, myositis ossificans, focal myositis, giant cell myositis


Epidemiology

Among the middle-aged population in the United States, autoimmune disorders are the leading cause of increased mortality. The incidence rates vary [14]. Polymyositis usually affects people above the age of 20 years and is rarely present in childhood. Dermatomyositis has a bimodal age distribution affecting the population between 5 to 15 years and 45 to 60 years [15]. 

The incidence of polymyositis is double in women as compared to men.

In the USA, the rate of development of polymyositis is about 0.5 to 8.4 cases per 100,000 individuals. It is more common in Blacks than in Whites.


Pathophysiology

Rhabdomyolysis occurs in patients with polymyositis due to direct damage caused by the cellular immune response that develops as a result of abnormal activation of cytotoxic T cells (CD8) and macrophages with some involvement of type B lymphocytes and dendritic cells.

The release of inflammatory mediators in circulation by the cells such as cytokines and interleukins can cause indirect damage. 

There is a significant increase in pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-21, both in the muscle and serum of affected patients, as well as increased expression of IL-21 receptors (IL-21R) in damaged muscle fibers in these patients [16]. T helper type 1 response due to the release of cytokines and T helper type 17 response due to its pro-inflammatory mediators are other mechanisms that cause polymyositis [17,18].

Certain cytokines such as IL-1alpha and IL-17 upregulate the nuclear factor kappa B signaling pathway to increase MHC-1 class expression. Nuclear factor kappa B also damages myofibrils by affecting the myocytes' differentiating ability negatively [19]. 

Other causes for polymyositis include damage to vascular endothelium leading to extravasation of inflammatory mediators from circulation as well as the involvement of humoral immune response. 


Histopathology

Polymyositis is a chronic inflammatory disease hence a biopsy will show multiple small foci of inflammatory and necrotic changes and regenerative nodules. In the early stage histopathology of polymyositis will show endomysial mononuclear infiltrate consisting of mostly CD8 T cells and macrophages along with necrotic myofibrils. In the late stage changes include occluded capillaries due to inflammatory changes caused by endothelial damage and increased deposition of connective tissue and extracellular matrix. 


History and Physical Examination

A good detailed history must be obtained to diagnose polymyositis in the early stage. Family history and medication history should also be obtained. Polymyositis is a relatively challenging diagnosis. The following should be included in the history to make an accurate diagnosis: 


  • Gradual onset of muscle weakness with or without pain

  • Presence of multiple joint pain

  • Difficulty in standing up from the sitting posture. Difficulty in combing hair, inability to raise arms above the head, and holding the neck in an upright posture.

  • When there is systematic spread there can be dysphagia due to pharyngeal or esophageal muscle involvement, breathing difficulty, or chest tightness due to infiltrative cardiomyopathy or pericarditis.


Presenting features

Polymyositis is a progressive disease with symmetric involvement of shoulder and pelvis muscles as well as neck flexors [2]. There can be weakness of the muscles with or without pain. Hip extensors can be involved in some patients making it difficult for the patients to climb stairs or to change their posture. Patients may complain of the inability to raise their arms above their head or to get up from seated position. Disease progression to distal muscles can result in difficulty in writing and playing musical instruments. 

They can have constitutional symptoms such as low-grade fever, anorexia, arthralgia, and weight loss. Polymyositis can cause interstitial lung disease which will produce shortness of breath and dry cough [20]. The patients can have chest tightness and exertional dyspnea due to restrictive cardiomyopathy. Constipation or bloating can occur due to gastrointestinal involvement. Tightening and discoloration of fingers also can occur due to Raynaud phenomenon.

During physical examination, a complete motor and sensory examination of affected muscles is carried out. In patients with polymyositis, the sensory examination is usually normal. Motor examination shows a decrease in power in the affected muscles. Tendon reflexes are lost in patients with severe muscular atrophy.

Patients who have restrictive polymyositis can present with limited mobility of truncal muscles which leads to camptocormia [21]. The involvement of nasopharyngeal muscles can cause nasal speech. If interstitial lung disease is present, crackles can be heard at the lung bases. 

If the polymyositis is associated with malignancy, then features of that particular neoplasia can be seen e.g., lymphadenopathy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Skin rashes will be found in the presence of other autoimmune disorders such as mixed connective tissue disorder.


Evaluation

In evaluating patients with suspected polymyositis a multi-modal approach is taken. It consists of hematologic and serologic testing, imaging, electromyography, nerve conduction studies, and biopsy findings. A full blood count (FBC) can show an elevated lymphocyte count in the majority of the patients and frequently thrombocytosis is also present. The Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is elevated due to chronic inflammation. Serum creatine kinase (CK) levels can be very high. The levels can be up to 50 times the normal range (22 to 198 units/liter), indicating myocyte damage due to chronic inflammation. Serial serum creatine kinase monitoring can be of great clinical use to monitor disease progression. 

Elevation of multiple antibodies is not uncommon in patients with polymyositis. Antinuclear antibody (ANA), can be positive in about 33% of the patients with polymyositis. If ANA turns out to be positive, then specific antibody testing for anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) in the serum, is carried out. 

Patients with polymyositis will have abnormal electromyography (EMG) findings. There will be varying amplitude and velocity of the membranous action potential and fibrillation in potentials due to membrane irritability. 

An MRI is a useful investigation for the diagnosis of polymyositis. A biopsy can also be done which will show perivascular and endomysial mononuclear infiltrates and areas of necrosis staining pink due to high eosin stain [22]

If the patient has dysphagia, a barium swallow can be performed. In patients with lung disease, pulmonary function tests can be carried out. If polymyositis has caused damage to heart muscles, then an electrocardiogram and echocardiography can be performed.


Management

Polymyositis can be treated with a combination of different non-pharmacological and pharmacological modalities. Pharmacological treatment includes the use of corticosteroids. Methylprednisolone and prednisone are the most commonly used corticosteroids for the treatment of polymyositis. The starting dose of prednisolone is 1mg/kg of prednisone a day. The steroids cannot be withdrawn suddenly. They are tapered off gradually.

The second-line of treatment includes the use of immune modulators such as azathioprine, methotrexate, and cyclosporine in patients who either fail to respond to steroids or develop severe side effects due to the steroids. 

Cyclophosphamide is an immune-modulator that works efficiently in patients with the involvement of the lungs [23].

In patients with chronic refractory polymyositis, intravenous immunoglobulins can be used. A study by Cherin et al [24] showed improvement in around 70% of the patients with the use of intravenous immunoglobulins. 

Patients with dysphagia due to esophageal involvement also show significant improvement with intravenous immunoglobulins [25].

There are certain biologics such as infliximab and etanercept, that have been used in treating refractory cases of polymyositis [26]. Other therapeutic options include tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor, with simultaneous use of prednisolone [27]. Mycophenolate mofetil and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab have been found to be useful in treating refractory cases of polymyositis.

Non-pharmacological treatment includes physical therapy of the involved muscles to prevent disuse atrophy. The patients need supervised resistive strength training exercises/activities [28]. Their diet should be rich in proteins that help in muscle building.


Differential Diagnosis

When a patient presents with myopathy, the following conditions have to be excluded to make a definite diagnosis:


  1. Electrolyte imbalance-induced myopathy. Electrolyte imbalance can occur due to the loss of potassium, phosphate, or magnesium from the body. Hypokalemia/Hypophosphatemia can cause muscle cramps and aches which mimic polymyositis.

  2. Hormonal disorders. Endocrinological disorders such as hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism, diabetes mellitus, and metabolic syndrome can produce proximal musculature weakness just as in polymyositis. 

  3. Other autoimmune disorders. Other autoimmune disorders must be excluded before a diagnosis of polymyositis is made. The most common differential is dermatomyositis which can be easily differentiated by the dermatologic presentation. Other disorders that are to be kept in mind before making the diagnosis of polymyositis are scleroderma, iatrogenic myopathies, myasthenia gravis, mixed connective tissue disorder, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and myositis-induced myopathies. 

  4. Chronic steroid use. A history of chronic steroid use should be obtained to exclude steroid-induced myopathy or Cushing syndrome.

  5. Fibromyalgia or polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). Patients with fibromyalgia or polymyalgia rheumatica can complain about muscle pain and weakness. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis should be excluded because it can also produce myopathy.

  6. Drugs with a tendency to produce myopaty. Certain drugs can produce myopathies. All drugs having a tendency for myopathy should be kept in mind. These include chloroquine/primaquine, statins, azathioprine, alcohol derivates, e.g., ethanol, antimetabolites (vincristine), and anti-fungal agents.


Prognosis

Polymyositis being a chronic disease, in the long run, it is associated with a grave prognosis. It produces disability and affects the quality of life of the patient. It is associated with a 10% mortality rate, especially in those who develop cardiac dysfunction or malignant conditions [29]. Majority of the patients usually respond to steroid therapy. This disease has the worst prognosis in older females, Blacks and patients having refractory disease, and patients who have systematic involvement.


Complications

Polymyositis has been found to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality due to its associated comorbid conditions such as involvement of major vessels, heart, lung, and gastrointestinal tract. The risk of myocardial infarct is about 2.2% in patients with polymyositis as compared to the general population [30]. There is a risk of developing cancer within a year of diagnosis of polymyositis [31]. The presence of a high neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in patients above the age of 60 years greatly increases the risk of having carcinoma of lung/bladder or non-Hodgkin lymphoma [32].

In the late stage of the disease, polymyositis can affect the distal musculature of the esophagus in up to 70% of the patients leading to inability to swallow, as well as regurgitation problems which can cause aspiration pneumonia [33]. Lung involvement can increase the mortality rate and it can have an adverse impact on the quality of life. Polymyositis, in females of the child-bearing age group, can cause fetal loss.

Polymyositis can produce a hypercoagulable state in the plasma leading to an increased incidence of thromboembolism [34]. Polymyositis can increase the risk of the development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [35]. The risk of osteoporosis is also increased in patients with polymyositis [36].


References

  1. Bohan A. History and classification of polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Clin Dermatol. 1988 Apr-Jun;6(2):3-8. 

  2. Strauss KW, Gonzalez-Buritica H, Khamashta MA, Hughes GR. Polymyositis-dermatomyositis: a clinical review. Postgrad Med J. 1989 Jul;65(765):437-43. 

  3. Dalakas MC. Sporadic inclusion body myositis--diagnosis, pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2006 Aug;2(8):437-47.

  4. Kamiya M, Mizoguchi F, Takamura A, Kimura N, Kawahata K, Kohsaka H. A new in vitro model of polymyositis reveals CD8+ T cell invasion into muscle cells and its cytotoxic role. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Jan 01;59(1):224-232. 

  5. Karpati G, Pouliot Y, Carpenter S. Expression of immunoreactive major histocompatibility complex products in human skeletal muscles. Ann Neurol. 1988 Jan;23(1):64-72.

  6. Richardson SJ, Lopez F, Rojas S, Cho S, Holodniy M, Herndier B, Katz J. Multinodular polymyositis in a patient with human immunodeficiency and hepatitis C virus coinfection. Muscle Nerve. 2001 Mar;24(3):433-7. 

  7. Dalakas MC, Pezeshkpour GH, Gravell M, Sever JL. Polymyositis associated with AIDS retrovirus. JAMA. 1986 Nov 07;256(17):2381-3.

  8. Gómez Rodríguez N, Ibáñez Ruán J, González Rodríguez M. [Coxsackie virus infection associated with myositis and polyarthritis]. An Med Interna. 2008 Feb;25(2):90-2.

  9. Hill CL, Zhang Y, Sigurgeirsson B, Pukkala E, Mellemkjaer L, Airio A, Evans SR, Felson DT. Frequency of specific cancer types in dermatomyositis and polymyositis: a population-based study. Lancet. 2001 Jan 13;357(9250):96-100.

  10. Shapiro M, Blanco DA. Neurological Complications of Gastrointestinal Disease. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2017 Feb;24(1):43-53.

  11. Grable-Esposito P, Katzberg HD, Greenberg SA, Srinivasan J, Katz J, Amato AA. Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy associated with statins. Muscle Nerve. 2010 Feb;41(2):185-90.

  12. Bohan A. History and classification of polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Clin Dermatol. 1988 Apr-Jun. 6(2):3-8.

  13. Zampieri S, Valente M, Adami N, et al. Polymyositis, dermatomyositis and malignancy: a further intriguing link. Autoimmun Rev. 2010 Apr. 9(6):449-53.

  14. Cooper GS, Stroehla BC. The epidemiology of autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun Rev. 2003 May;2(3):119-25.

  15. Marie I, Hatron PY, Levesque H, Hachulla E, Hellot MF, Michon-Pasturel U, Courtois H, Devulder B. Influence of age on characteristics of polymyositis and dermatomyositis in adults. Medicine (Baltimore). 1999 May;78(3):139-47.

  16. Liu T, Hou Y, Dai TJ, Yan CZ. Upregulation of Interleukin 21 and Interleukin 21 Receptor in Patients with Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 Sep 05;130(17):2101-2106.

  17. Allenbach Y, Chaara W, Rosenzwajg M, Six A, Prevel N, Mingozzi F, Wanschitz J, Musset L, Charuel JL, Eymard B, Salomon B, Duyckaerts C, Maisonobe T, Dubourg O, Herson S, Klatzmann D, Benveniste O. Th1 response and systemic treg deficiency in inclusion body myositis. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e88788. 

  18. Moran EM, Mastaglia FL. The role of interleukin-17 in immune-mediated inflammatory myopathies and possible therapeutic implications. Neuromuscul Disord. 2014 Nov;24(11):943-52.

  19. Creus KK, De Paepe B, De Bleecker JL. Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and the classical NF-kappaB complex: current insights and implications for therapy. Autoimmun Rev. 2009 Jun;8(7):627-31.

  20. Schnabel A, Hellmich B, Gross WL. Interstitial lung disease in polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2005 Apr;7(2):99-105.

  21. Kuo SH, Vullaganti M, Jimenez-Shahed J, Kwan JY. Camptocormia as a presentation of generalized inflammatory myopathy. Muscle Nerve. 2009 Dec;40(6):1059-63. 

  22. Chahin N, Engel AG. Correlation of muscle biopsy, clinical course, and outcome in PM and sporadic IBM. Neurology. 2008 Feb 05;70(6):418-24.

  23. Shimojima Y, Ishii W, Matsuda M, Kishida D, Ikeda SI. Effective Use of Calcineurin Inhibitor in Combination Therapy for Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients With Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Mar;23(2):87-93. 

  24. Cherin P, Pelletier S, Teixeira A, Laforet P, Genereau T, Simon A, Maisonobe T, Eymard B, Herson S. Results and long-term followup of intravenous immunoglobulin infusions in chronic, refractory polymyositis: an open study with thirty-five adult patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Feb;46(2):467-74.

  25. Marie I, Menard JF, Hatron PY, Hachulla E, Mouthon L, Tiev K, Ducrotte P, Cherin P. Intravenous immunoglobulins for steroid-refractory esophageal involvement related to polymyositis and dermatomyositis: a series of 73 patients. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Dec;62(12):1748-55. 

  26. Schiffenbauer A, Garg M, Castro C, Pokrovnichka A, Joe G, Shrader J, Cabalar IV, Faghihi-Kashani S, Harris-Love MO, Plotz PH, Miller FW, Gourley M. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of infliximab in refractory polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Jun;47(6):858-864.

  27. Ueno KI, Shimojima Y, Kishida D, Sekijima Y, Ikeda SI. Advantage of administering tacrolimus for improving prognosis of patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Int J Rheum Dis. 2016 Dec;19(12):1322-1330.

  28. Alexanderson H. Exercise: an important component of treatment in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2005 Apr;7(2):115-24.

  29. Bronner IM, van der Meulen MF, de Visser M, Kalmijn S, van Venrooij WJ, Voskuyl AE, Dinant HJ, Linssen WH, Wokke JH, Hoogendijk JE. Long-term outcome in polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Nov;65(11):1456-61.

  30. Rai SK, Choi HK, Sayre EC, Aviña-Zubieta JA. Risk of myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke in adults with polymyositis and dermatomyositis: a general population-based study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Mar;55(3):461-9.

  31. Chen YJ, Wu CY, Huang YL, Wang CB, Shen JL, Chang YT. Cancer risks of dermatomyositis and polymyositis: a nationwide cohort study in Taiwan. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(2):R70.

  32. Nicoletis I, Pasco J, Maillot F, Goupille P, Corcia P, Grammatico-Guillon L, Machet L. High pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with dermatomyositis/polymyositis predicts an increased risk of cancer. Eur J Dermatol. 2020 Apr 10.

  33. de Merieux P, Verity MA, Clements PJ, Paulus HE. Esophageal abnormalities and dysphagia in polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 1983 Aug;26(8):961-8.

  34. Carruthers EC, Choi HK, Sayre EC, Aviña-Zubieta JA. Risk of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in individuals with polymyositis and dermatomyositis: a general population-based study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan;75(1):110-6.

  35. Tseng CC, Chang SJ, Tsai WC, Ou TT, Wu CC, Sung WY, Hsieh MC, Yen JH. Increased Incidence of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Polymyositis: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Aug;69(8):1231-1237. 

  36. Lee CW, Muo CH, Liang JA, Sung FC, Hsu CY, Kao CH. Increased osteoporosis risk in dermatomyositis or polymyositis independent of the treatments: a population-based cohort study with propensity score. Endocrine. 2016 Apr;52(1):86-92.

Wednesday, 23 November 2022

 

             Sacroiliitis


                                     Dr. KS Dhillon



Introduction

Sacroiliitis is an inflammation of the sacroiliac joint (SI). It usually produces pain in the buttock and low back. Often sacroiliitis is a diagnosis of exclusion. The sacroiliac joint (SI) is one of the largest joints in the body. It connects the ilium to the sacrum. Sacroiliitis is difficult to diagnose because its symptoms are similar to many other common sources of low back pain. Sacroiliitis is often overlooked as a source of back or buttock pain. Pain in sacroiliitis is often due to chronic degenerative causes. Sacroiliitis can also be secondary to rheumatic, infectious, drug-related, or oncologic sources. Some of the non-degenerative conditions that can lead to sacroiliitis are psoriatic arthropathy, Bechet disease, ankylosing spondylitis, hyperparathyroidism, and various pyogenic sources [1-3]. 


Etiology

There are several conditions that can cause inflammation of the SI joint.  Degeneration of the joint can produce osteoarthritis of the SI joints. Spondyloarthropathies such as psoriatic arthropathy, Bechet disease, and ankylosing spondylitis, can cause significant inflammation of the joint. Pregnancy is another cause of inflammation due to the hormone relaxin leading to the relaxation, stretching, and possible widening of the SI joints. The increased body weight during pregnancy also causes extra mechanical stress on the joint, leading to further wear and tear. Trauma can also cause direct or indirect stress and damage to the SI joints. The most frequent cause of acute sacroiliitis is infection of the joints. Pain can originate from the synovial SI joint but can also come from the posterior sacral ligaments [4,5].


Epidemiology

Reports on the prevalence of sacroiliac pain differ widely. Some studies have reported that the prevalence is between 10% to 25% in patients with low back pain. In patients with a confirmed diagnosis, the presentation of pain is in the ipsilateral buttock in 94% of the cases and in the lower lumbar area in 74% of the cases. In about 50% of cases, the pain radiates to the lower extremity, in 6% to the upper lumbar area, in 4% percent to the groin, and in 2% percent to the lower abdomen [6,7].


Pathophysiology

The sacrum articulates with the ilium at the SI joint (fig 1). The joint helps to distribute body weight to the pelvis. The capsule of the SI joint is relatively thin and it often develops defects that enable fluid, such as joint effusion or pus, to leak out onto the surrounding tissues. 

The common distribution of pain is along the L4-L5 dermatomes, but the distribution can be from as high as L2 to as low as S3. The differential diagnosis includes leg-length discrepancies, weakness of one limb, weakness of the gluteal muscles, tight surrounding muscle structures, or hip osteoarthritis [8].

Fig 1


History and Physical Examination

Patients with sacroiliitis usually present with low back pain. The pain can be in one or both buttocks, hip region, thigh region, or even more distally. Sometimes patients report that their pain is worse after sitting for prolonged periods or with rotational movements. The characterization of pain varies widely. It is commonly described as sharp and stabbing in nature but can also be described as dull and achy in nature. The patient has to be asked about a history of inflammatory disorders. History of systemic symptoms such as fevers, chills, night sweats, and weight loss should be obtained. These systemic symptoms are indicative of a systemic illness.

Inspection may reveal pelvic asymmetry. Limb length measurement can rule out a leg-length inequality. The spine should be inspected for rotational abnormalities or abnormal curvatures. Usually the range of motion, neurologic, and strength testing are unremarkable. The patient may experience pain during some of these tests.

There are special provocative tests that can be very helpful in reproducing the patient’s pain:


  • “Fortin finger test”- Have the patient use one finger to localize their pain. A positive test is when the patient twice identifies the painful region as within 1 cm of inferomedial to the posterior superior iliac spine.

  • FABER test- reproduction of pain after hip flexion, abduction, and external rotation.

  • Sacral distraction test- Pain reproduction on applying pressure to the anterior superior iliac spine.

  • Iliac compression test- pain reproduction on applying pressure downward on the superior aspect of the iliac crest.

  • Gaenslen test- reproduction of pain on hyperextension of the hip on the affected side. The patient flexes the hip on the unaffected side and then dangles the affected leg off the examining table. Pressure is then directed downward on the leg to extend the hip further.

  • Thigh thrust test- reproduction of pain on flexing the hip and applying a posterior shearing force on the SI joint.

  • Sacral thrust test- reproduction of pain with the patient prone and applying an anterior pressure through the sacrum.

The likelihood of SI joint pain increases as the number of positive provocative tests increases.


Evaluation

If an inflammatory condition is suspected to be the cause of SI joint pain the following tests should be ordered: complete blood cell count (FBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein, antinuclear antibody, human leukocyte antigen (HLA-B27), and rheumatoid factor. 

Common laboratory findings in patients with aseptic sacroiliitis include:

  • WBC count - usually normal 

  • ESR - elevated

  • CRP - elevated

  • HLA-B27 - About 50% to 92%% of patients with ankylosing spondylitis will be HLA-B27 positive

  • Rheumatoid Factor (RF) - Negative in patients with true ankylosing spondylitis

If trauma or inflammatory causes are not suspected, then x rays are not needed. If x-rays are done an anteroposterior view of the pelvis/lumbar spine should be ordered. The x-rays can show sclerosis or other degenerative changes in the SI joint. Specific sacroiliac views can be taken at a 25 to 30-degree angle to help identify joint widening or sclerotic changes at joint margins. A CT scan can also show sclerotic changes and reveal reactive spurring or subluxation. An MRI may show subchondral edema, which is the earliest sign of sacroiliitis. A PET scan can be ordered if bony metastatic disease is suspected.

The most useful test for the diagnosis of sacroiliitis is SI joint injection with local anesthetics and steroids. If the injection relieves the pain, it is highly likely that the inflammation at this site was the cause of the pain. 


Treatment 

Since hypermobility can cause pain physical therapy can be very useful. Physical therapy can help to strengthen lumbopelvic musculature and stabilize the joint. If the pain is due to lack of mobility, then physical therapy can help increase mobility of the SI joint.  In the acute phase, NSAIDs are useful but they become less effective in the chronic phase. Intra-articular anesthetic/steroid injections can be performed under image guidance. 

If NSAIDs and injections do not work radiofrequency ablation can be tried. Surgery is usually reserved as a last resort for patients with chronic pain. SI joint fusion can be carried with SI screws [9-11].

If there is infection intravenous antibiotics can be given. If there is an abscess surgery would be required.


Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis would include:

  • Ankylosing spondylitis

  • Hip tendonitis/fracture

  • Piriformis syndrome

  • Sacroiliac joint infection

  • Trochanteric bursitis


Outcomes

The outcome in majority of patients with sacroiliitis is excellent. However, the recovery can take about 2 to 4 weeks. Some publications report a recurrence rate of over 30% [12,13].


References

  1. Slobodin G, Hussein H, Rosner I, Eshed I. Sacroiliitis - early diagnosis is key. J Inflamm Res. 2018;11:339-344. 

  2. Chahal BS, Kwan ALC, Dhillon SS, Olubaniyi BO, Jhiangri GS, Neilson MM, Lambert RGW. Radiation Exposure to the Sacroiliac Joint From Low-Dose CT Compared With Radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Nov;211(5):1058-1062. [PubMed]

  3. Gutierrez M, Rodriguez S, Soto-Fajardo C, Santos-Moreno P, Sandoval H, Bertolazzi C, Pineda C. Ultrasound of sacroiliac joints in spondyloarthritis: a systematic review. Rheumatol Int. 2018 Oct;38(10):1791-1805.

  4. Kocak O, Kocak AY, Sanal B, Kulan G. Bilateral Sacroiliitis Confirmed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging during Isotretinoin Treatment: Assessment of 11 Patients and a Review of the Literature. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2017 Oct;25(3):228-233.

  5. Pandita A, Madhuripan N, Hurtado RM, Dhamoon A. Back pain and oedematous Schmorl node: a diagnostic dilemma. BMJ Case Rep. 2017 May 22;2017.

  6. Protopopov M, Poddubnyy D. Radiographic progression in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018 Jun;14(6):525-533.

  7. Ziade NR. HLA B27 antigen in Middle Eastern and Arab countries: systematic review of the strength of association with axial spondyloarthritis and methodological gaps. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jun 29;18(1):280.

  8. Poddubnyy D, Listing J, Haibel H, Knüppel S, Rudwaleit M, Sieper J. Functional relevance of radiographic spinal progression in axial spondyloarthritis: results from the German spondyloarthritis Inception Cohort. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Apr 01;57(4):703-711.

  9. Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging: Bernard SA, Kransdorf MJ, Beaman FD, Adler RS, Amini B, Appel M, Arnold E, Cassidy RC, Greenspan BS, Lee KS, Tuite MJ, Walker EA, Ward RJ, Wessell DE, Weissman BN. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Back Pain Suspected Sacroiliitis-Spondyloarthropathy. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 May;14(5S): S62-S70.

  10. Nash P, Lubrano E, Cauli A, Taylor WJ, Olivieri I, Gladman DD. Updated guidelines for the management of axial disease in psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2014 Nov;41(11):2286-9.

  11. van der Heijde D, Ramiro S, Landewé R, Baraliakos X, Van den Bosch F, Sepriano A, Regel A, Ciurea A, Dagfinrud H, Dougados M, van Gaalen F, Géher P, van der Horst-Bruinsma I, Inman RD, Jongkees M, Kiltz U, Kvien TK, Machado PM, Marzo-Ortega H, Molto A, Navarro-Compàn V, Ozgocmen S, Pimentel-Santos FM, Reveille J, Rudwaleit M, Sieper J, Sampaio-Barros P, Wiek D, Braun J. 2016 update of the ASAS-EULAR management recommendations for axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):978-991.

  12. Darr E, Meyer SC, Whang PG, Kovalsky D, Frank C, Lockstadt H, Limoni R, Redmond A, Ploska P, Oh MY, Cher D, Chowdhary A. Long-term prospective outcomes after minimally invasive trans-iliac sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants. Med Devices (Auckl). 2018;11:113-121. 

  13. van Lunteren M, Ez-Zaitouni Z, de Koning A, Dagfinrud H, Ramonda R, Jacobsson L, Landewé R, van der Heijde D, van Gaalen FA. In Early Axial Spondyloarthritis, Increasing Disease Activity Is Associated with Worsening of Health-related Quality of Life over Time. J Rheumatol. 2018 Jun;45(6):779-784.

Sunday, 20 November 2022

       Anterior interosseous nerve syndrome (Kiloh-Nevin Syndrome)



                            Dr. KS Dhillon




The anterior interosseous nerve syndrome is a constellation of signs and symptoms that refers to weakness of the flexor pollicis longus, pronator quadratus, and the flexor digitorum profundus to the index finger. The anterior interosseous nerve does supply sensory fibers to the radiocarpal, midcarpal, and carpometacarpal joints, though the syndrome by definition refers to a purely motor constellation of signs and symptoms. 

The strictly motor anterior interosseous syndrome can be associated with additional extrasyndromic signs and symptoms. The additional findings suggest that the underlying pathology resides outside of the anterior interosseous nerve (median nerve or brachial plexus) or that the aberrant anatomic features exist distal to the pathologic lesion in the anterior interosseous nerve.

The causes of anterior interosseous nerve syndrome can be divided into 2 broad categories. The anterior interosseous neuropathies include those compression neuropathies, neuritides, congenital anomalies, and anatomic lesions, and discontinuities of the anterior interosseous nerve itself. The pseudo–anterior interosseous neuropathies [1] represent pathologies affecting more proximal anatomic sites, but involve nerve fascicles contributing to the anterior interosseous nerve more distally. The Parsonage-Turner syndrome, in which anterior interosseous nerve syndrome is associated with weakness of the parascapular muscles, is a classic example of the pseudo–anterior interosseous neuropathies [2].




Anatomy

The median nerve gives rise to the anterior interosseous nerve from its radial aspect just after coursing between the two heads of the pronator teres muscle. This take-off of the anterior interosseous nerve from the median nerve occurs 5 to 8 cm distal to the lateral epicondyle [3] and 22.4 to 23.4 cm proximal to the radial styloid [4,5]. It passes beneath the fibrous arch of the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle and then enters the flexor digitorum profundus muscle belly at about 30% of the forearm length distal to the medial epicondyle [6]. The nerve then passes distally on the volar surface of the interosseous membrane. About 4 cm distal to its takeoff from the median nerve, the anterior interosseous nerve gives rise to motor branches to the flexor pollicis longus, the flexor digitorum profundus to the index finger, and, the flexor digitorum profundus to the middle finger [3].

The nerve then supplies a motor branch to the pronator quadratus before terminating as sensory branches to the radiocarpal, midcarpal, and carpometacarpal joints.


Clinical presentation

The only consistent finding in the anterior interosseous syndrome is

paresis or paralysis of the flexor pollicis longus, pronator quadratus, and the flexor digitorum of the index finger. In patients with incomplete anterior interosseous syndrome, there may be weakness of either the flexor pollicis longus or the flexor digitorum profundus indicis [7]. Weakness initially manifests as difficulty or clumsiness with writing or with fine pinch activities such as sewing. A history of trauma suggests either mechanical disruption of the nerve, injury to the nerve, or compression neuropathy. Injuries causing anterior interosseous neuropathy include penetrating trauma, blunt injury, and traction injury. The association between supracondylar fractures of the humerus [8,9] and fractures of the proximal forearm [10-12] have classic associations with the anterior interosseous syndrome. With anterior interosseous or pseudo–anterior interosseous neuritides, the onset of neurologic symptoms is typically sudden and rapidly progressive. Patients usually complain of proximal volar forearm or shoulder pain. Pain is often of sudden onset and may be related to minor trauma. 



Examination

In patients with anterior interosseous syndrome, the resting repose of the hand will exhibit an unnatural extension of the distal interphalangeal joint (DIP) of the index finger and interphalangeal joint (IP) of the thumb, as compared with the gentle flexion arcade of the remaining fingers. 

The main finding on physical examination is weakness of the flexor pollicis longus, flexor digitorum profundus indicis, and pronator quadratus. Weakness of the flexor pollicis longus and flexor digitorum profundus to the index finger is indicated by an inability to make the “OK” sign. The DIP joint of the index finger and the IP joint of the thumb are hyperextended during attempted tip-to-tip pinch. The area of contact between the index finger and thumb is a flatter, broader area found more proximally.

Spinner [13] has described a sign where the patient is asked to make a fist.  When making a fist the tips of the small, ring, and middle fingers are able to achieve flexion to the distal palmar crease. However, the tips of the index finger is conspicuously excluded. The thumb remains straight. It is usually difficult to examine the pronator quadratus. 


Etiology

For the treatment of anterior interosseous nerve syndrome, the cause has to be identified. 

The causes of  anterior interosseous syndrome include:

  • Direct injury to the nerve

  • Midshaft radius fracture

  • Compression due to fibrous bands (pronator, FDS), enlarged median artery, hematoma (trauma, coagulopathy), and tumors

  • Idiopathic inflammatory anterior interosseous neuropathy


The causes of pseudo–anterior interosseous neuropathies include:

  • Supracondylar humerus fracture

  • Proximal radius fracture

  • Antebrachial venipuncture or catheterization

  • Inflammatory- Acute brachial neuropathy and Parsonage-Turner syndrome


Differential diagnosis

Anterior interosseous neuropathy must be distinguished from a tendon rupture. A tendon rupture can easily be excluded by careful examination for tenodesis. When the flexor tendon is intact, passive wrist extension should produce passive thumb and finger IP joint flexion. Tendon rupture should be suspected in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and Kienbo¨ck disease [3]. In patients with rheumatoid disease, attritional rupture can occur as a result of volar carpal subluxation. In patients with Kienbo¨ck disease, proximal carpal pathology may lead to attritional tendon rupture. Tendon rupture due to scaphoid nonunion also has been reported [14,15].


Eletrodiagnostic studies

Electrodiagnostic studies should include electromyography of the flexor pollicis longus, pronator quadratus, and flexor digitorum profundus indicis. The pronator teres is typically innervated by the median nerve, hence electromyographic testing of the pronator teres should distinguish anterior interosseous neuropathy from proximal compression of the median nerve affecting fascicles of the anterior introsseous nerve.

Electromyographic studies are most helpful after a history of trauma, especially blunt injury. Complete lesions of the nerve are amenable to immediate exploration and repair. Surgical exploration of incomplete lesions can be deferred for several months.

The presence of positive sharp waves or fibrillation potentials indicates

nerve degeneration and that provides an indication for surgical exploration.


Treatment

In the literature, there is considerable controversy surrounding the treatment of anterior interosseous syndrome. Sunderland [16] reported motor recovery in all patients following resection of fibrous bands that were constricting the anterior interosseous nerve followed by anterior interosseous neurolysis. 

Stern [17] reported complete recovery in 3 patients with compression neuropathy of the anterior interosseous nerve after surgical treatment following the failure of conservative treatment.

Miller-Breslow et al [18], on the other hand, reported their results of

nonoperative management in 10 patients with spontaneous anterior interosseous nerve paralysis. Eight of their patients recovered fully within 1 year. Their patients reported a prodrome of forearm pain and they probably suffered from anterior interosseous neuritis rather than compression neuropathy.

This controversy relating to surgical versus nonoperative treatment of anterior interosseous syndrome may in large part be due to the broad range of pathologies that produce similar clinical findings.

Therefore, the probability and extent of motor recovery from anterior interosseous syndrome will depend on a correct and precise diagnosis. 

Anterior interosseous syndrome represents a similar group of findings and does not refer to a single distinct pathology. A good history, thorough neurologic examination, and an electrodiagnostic study will distinguish pseudo–anterior interosseous neuropathies from focal lesions of the AIN itself.

Once the diagnosis is established, etiologic factors must guide therapy. A  history of penetrating injury suggests mechanical disruption or compression of the nerve. Surgical exploration and nerve decompression or repair would be required.

When there is blunt trauma, management of anterior interosseous palsy is less straightforward. If electromyography is suggestive of a complete lesion then early surgical exploration would be indicated. Partial injuries can be given an opportunity to recover spontaneously. If there is no improvement after 6 to 12 weeks, surgical exploration may be warranted. If there are positive sharp waves or fibrillation potentials on electromyography, surgical exploration and neurolysis may be indicated.

Spontaneous or rapid onset of weakness is suggestive of anterior interosseous neuritis or pseudo–anterior interosseous neuritis. In such cases, neurologic symptoms are usually preceded by proximal anterior forearm or shoulder pain and tenderness. Pain usually subsides by the time weakness of the pinch is noted. If there is a history of fatigue, fever, myalgia, or other prodromic systemic symptoms then an inflammatory process is likely, which may resolve spontaneously or with systemic steroids. 

There are, however, no persuasive studies that show that the use of systemic steroids has any effect on the rate, extent, or probability of motor recovery from anterior interosseous nerve syndrome. 

Spinner [13] initially treats spontaneous paralysis of the anterior interosseous nerve nonsurgically but recommends surgical exploration within 12 weeks if no clinical or electromyographic improvement is evident. Spontaneous recovery after 12 months has been well-documented [18,19], and some have recommended waiting at least this long for spontaneous recovery before proceeding with surgical exploration.

Miller-Breslow et al [18] followed up 10 patients with spontaneous anterior interosseous nerve paralysis, all of whom had an initial history of pain. Eight of the 10 patients recovered fully within 1 year. Miller-Breslow et al [18] advocated nonsurgical management extending beyond 1 year.

When the anterior interosseous nerve fails to recover and it cannot be reconstructed, or should there be irreversible muscular atrophy after a prolonged period of denervation, tendon transfers to the thumb and index finger are recommended. 

Spinner [13] recommends the transfer of a slip of flexor digitorum superficialis tendon from the ring or middle finger to the tendon of either the flexor pollicis longus or the flexor digitorum profundus indicis.

This is possible only if the median nerve itself, with its innervation to the flexor digitorum superficialis, is unaffected. Brachioradialis transfer to the flexor pollicis longus or the extensor carpi radialis longus to the flexor digitorum profundus of the index finger are acceptable alternatives [13].


Conclusion

Anterior interosseous nerve syndrome is characterized by a triad of clinical findings that include weakness of the flexor pollicis longus, pronator quadratus, and flexor digitorum profundus of the index finger. The findings do not refer to a single distinct pathology. A physical examination for accompanying features can provide important clues as to whether pathology resides within the nerve (anterior interosseous neuropathy) or proximal to the nerve (pseudo–anterior interosseous neuropathy). Proper treatment depends on a precise and accurate diagnosis.



References

  1. Wertsch J, Sanger JR, Matloub HS. Pseudo-anterior interosseous nerve syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1985;8:68-70.

  2. Parsonage M, Turner JW. Neuralgic amyotrophy: the shoulder-girdle syndrome. Lancet 1948;1:973-978.

  3. North E, Kaul MP. Compression neuropathies: median. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996.

  4. Sunderland S. The innervation of the flexor digitorum profundus and lumbrical muscles. Anat Rec 1945;93:317-321.

  5. Sunderland S. The intraneural topography of the radial, median, and ulnar nerves. Brain 1945;68:243-299.

  6. Bhadra N, Keith M, Peckham P. Variations in innervation of the flexor digitorum profundus muscle. J Hand Surg [Am] 1999;24:700-703.

  7. Hill N, Howard FM, Huffer BR. The incomplete anterior interosseous nerve syndrome. J Hand Surg [Am] 1985;10:4-16.

  8. Spinner M, Schrieber SN. The anterior interosseous nerve paralysis as a complication of supracondylar fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969;51A:1584-1590.

  9. Cramer K, Green N, Devito D. Incidence of anterior interosseous nerve palsy in supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Ped Orthop 1993;13:502-505.

  10. Geissler W, Fernandez DL, Graca R. Anterior interosseous nerve palsy complicating a forearm fracture in a child. J Hand Surg [Am] 1990;15A:44-47.

  11. Gainor B, Olson S. Combined entrapment of the median and anterior interosseous nerves in a pediatric both-bone forearm fracture. J Orthop Trauma 1990;4:197-199.

  12. Huang K, Pun WK, Coleman S. Entrapment and transection of the median nerve associated with greenstick fractures of the forearm: case report and review of the literature. J Trauma 1998; 44: 1101-1102.

  13. Spinner M. Injuries to the major branches of peripheral nerves of the forearm. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1978;160-227.

  14. McLain R, Steyers CM. Tendon ruptures with scaphoid nonunion. A case report. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1990;255:117- 120.

  15. Mahring M, Semple C, Gray IC. Attritional flexor tendon rupture due to a scaphoid nonunion imitating an anterior interosseous nerve syndrome: a case report. J Hand Surg [Br] 1985;10:62-64.

  16. Sunderland S. Nerves and nerve injuries. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1978;660:695-696.

  17. Stern M. The anterior interosseous nerve syndrome (the Kiloh-Nevin syndrome). Report and follow-up study of three cases. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1984;187:223-227.

  18. Miller-Breslow A, Terrono A, Millender LH. Nonoperative treatment of anterior interosseous nerve paralysis. J Hand Surg [Am] 1990;15:493-496.

  19. Sood M, Burke FD. Anterior interosseous nerve palsy: a review of 16 cases. J Hand Surg 1997;22:64-68.