Monday, 30 September 2024

       Ollier disease

                                     Dr. KS Dhillon


Introduction

Enchondromas are common intraosseous, usually benign cartilaginous tumors. They develop close to the growth plate cartilage. When multiple enchondromas are present, the condition is called enchondromatosis. Enchondromatosis is also known as Ollier disease. The prevalence of Ollier disease is estimated to be 1 in 100,000 individuals. Clinical manifestations usually appear in the first decade of life. In Ollier disease, there is an asymmetric distribution of cartilage lesions. These lesions can be extremely variable in terms of size, number, location, age of onset, and requirement for surgery. Enchondromas can produce skeletal deformities and limb-length discrepancies. They have the potential risk for malignant change to chondrosarcoma. When multiple enchondromatosis is associated with soft tissue hemangiomas, the condition is known as Maffucci syndrome. Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome occur in isolated patients. These conditions are not familial. It is uncertain whether the disorder is caused by a single gene defect or by combinations of germ-line and/or somatic mutations. The diagnosis is made by clinical and conventional radiological evaluations. Histological analysis has a limited role. It is mainly used if malignancy is suspected. Medical treatment has no role in the management of enchondromatosis. Surgery is usually indicated when there are complications such as pathological fractures, growth defects, and malignant transformation. It is difficult to assess the prognosis for Ollier disease. Forms with an early onset appear more severe. There is a risk of malignant transformation of enchondromas into chondrosarcomas in patients with Ollier disease.


Definition

Enchondromas are common benign cartilage tumors. They develop in the metaphyses and may become incorporated into the diaphyses of long tubular bones, in close proximity to growth plate cartilage (1-3). They are usually asymptomatic. Enchondromatosis or Ollier disease is defined by the presence of multiple enchondromas with an asymmetric distribution of cartilage lesions that can be very variable in terms of number, size, location, and age of onset (4).

Multiple enchondromatosis associated with soft tissue hemangiomas is known as Maffucci syndrome.


Epidemiology

It is the 2nd most common benign cartilage lesion. Osteochondroma is the most common. The male-to-female ratio is 1:1. It is most common in 20-50 year old individuals. It is usually found in the medullary cavity of the diaphysis or the metaphysis. The most common location is the hand (60%). It is more common in the hand as compared to the feet. The most common primary bone tumor in the hand is the enchondroma. Other locations include the distal femur (20%), proximal humerus (10%), and the tibia.


Clinical presentation

Ollier disease usually presents in the first decade of life. Clinical presentation usually starts with the appearance of palpable bony masses on a finger or toe, asymmetric shortening of an extremity, limp, osseous deformities with or without pathologic fractures (1-3). Physical examination usually shows visible masses embedded within phalanges, metacarpal, and metatarsal bones. Enchondromas usually affect long tubular bones, particularly the femur, the tibia, and/or the fibula. Flat bones, especially the pelvis, can also be affected. Multiple bones can be affected and the lesions are usually asymmetrically distributed, predominantly affecting one side of the body. Affected bones are quite often deformed and shortened. Bone shortening may be the only clinical sign of the disease. Bone shortening is often associated with bone bending and curving. This can lead to limitations in joint movements. Forearm deformities that are frequently encountered are similar to those observed in hereditary multiple exostosis (HME). The trunk is usually not affected, except for rib enchondromas and scoliosis which results from pelvis imbalance. In children, the lesions are subjected to pathologic fractures.

Clinical forms

Enchondromatosis has been recognized for a long time. Ollier at the end of the 19th century emphasized the asymmetrical and random distribution of enchondromas. Some authors have distinguished two subtypes of enchondromatosis i.e. enchondromatosis and Ollier disease. The first subtype affects mostly men. In this type, enchondromas are located mainly at the extremities and appear to be transmitted in an autosomal dominant fashion (5). The second form mainly affects women. In this subtype, there is sporadic unilateral distribution of enchondromas. The basis for this classification into two forms is not supported by a thorough analysis of available data. When multiple enchondromas are associated with hemangiomas it is referred to as Maffucci syndrome. Gabos and Bowen recently reported a previously unreported form in which there is extensive involvement of the epiphyseal and metaphyseal regions of long bones of the lower extremity (6).


Radiography

Enchondromas are most likely present at birth although they are rarely observed at birth. 

X-rays usually show multiple, radiolucent, homogenous lesions with an oval or elongated shape and a slightly thickened bony margin (fig 1a and 1b) (1-3). The lesions run parallel to the long bone axis. The lesions usually calcify with time. They become diffusely punctated or stippled, and a light trabeculation is usually visible. Enchondromas are frequently present as clusters. This leads to the metaphyseal widening. When they are localized at the bone border, they produce a typical notch-like image. A delay in bone age (average 0.6 +/- 1.3 years), has been reported in children with Ollier disease (7).

Enchondromas are usually localized in the metaphysis of long bones and in the small bones of the feet and hands. Initially, they are localized close to the growth plate cartilage. Later they migrate progressively towards the diaphysis. There may be irregularities in the epiphyseal region next to an affected metaphysis (1,6).



There is irregular distribution of the lesions. They can be localized to one limb, or limited to one half of the body. Though the lesions are limited largely to one side of the body, one or two enchondromas are frequently present on the other side, especially in the hand bones. When the lesions are distributed over the entire body, one side is usually more affected. The lesions in the hand almost never affect the metacarpal bones and phalanges.

Enchondromas can produce severe growth abnormalities. The growth abnormalities can be more severe than those observed in multiple exostosis. The affected diaphysis is short and massively enlarged. There may be bending close to the metaphysis. Ulnar shortening is usually more than shortening of the radius. The fingers are often of irregular sizes. Evidence of pathological fractures may be present.

Evidence of malignant transformation should be sought as it is a major complication of enchondromatosis. Signs of malignant transformation include extension of the tumor into soft tissues, cortical erosion, and irregularity or indistinctness of the surface of the tumour. Enchondromas are well circumscribed, chondrosarcomas on the other hand show poor demarcation. In differentiating enchondromas from chondrosarcomas the pattern of mineralization is also important. Enchondromas tend to show a uniform pattern of mineralization. 


Histopathology

There are multiple oval-shaped or round cartilaginous nodules in osseous portions of bone on macroscopic examination of enchondromas (1,2). The nodules are limited at their periphery by lamellar or woven bone and are separated from each other by intertrabecular marrow spaces. The cartilaginous tumor matrix is usually solid. Myxoid changes, which manifest as frayings of the matrix are present. The presence of a striking heterogeneity and diversity in the degree of cellularity and chondrocyte phenotype characterizes enchondromas. This heterogeneity depends on factors such as localization and the patient's age. Due to this important cellular heterogeneity, the distinction between benign enchondromas and malignant chondrosarcomas is difficult. The histological criteria for malignancy that are used for conventional chondrosarcoma cannot be used in Ollier disease. This is because of the increased cellularity. Therefore the distinction between enchondroma and grade I chondrosarcoma in enchondromatosis is extremely difficult or even impossible. The diagnosis relies on a combination of radiographical, clinical, and histological criteria.


Etiology and pathogenesis

Endochondral bone ossification is a highly regulated process. It requires the progression of undifferentiated mesenchymal cells into hypertrophic chondrocytes and the subsequent replacement of a cartilaginous matrix by mineralized bone (8,9). Enchondromas develop in the metaphysis of long bones close to the growth plate. It has been proposed that they result from abnormalities in signaling pathways controlling the proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes. This results in the development of intraosseous cartilaginous foci.


Genetics

Maffucci syndrome and Ollier disease are usually non-familial disorders (1-3). Both disorders tend to occur spontaneously and are not inherited. In Ollier disease, there is irregular distribution of the lesions. This strongly suggests that it is a disorder of endochondral bone formation that occurs due to a post-zygotic somatic mutation that results in mosaism. There have been two instances, where enchondromatosis has been observed in the sons of fathers who presented with mild skeletal dysplasia but without evidence of enchondromas (5,10). In one of these cases, there was a heterozygous mutation (R150C) in the PTH/PTHrP receptor (PTHR1 gene) that was inherited from the father (10).

Indian Hedgehog (IHH) and parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) act on their respective receptors PTHR1 and PTCH1 to exert a tightly coupled signaling relay, which is critical for the regulation of endochondral ossification. A study by Hopyan et al (10) showed that a mutant PTHR1 (R150C) was found to be expressed in enchondromas from two of six unrelated patients with enchondromatosis. The mutation was found on one parental allele in a patient and his father, who presented with mild skeletal dysplasia without enchondromatosis. However, in another study, neither the R150C mutation (26 tumors) nor any other mutation in the PTHR1 gene (11 patients) could be identified. This suggests that heterogeneity of the molecular defect(s) leads to enchondromatosis [11].

The mutant PTHR1 (R150C) seems to constitutively activate the PTHrP-dependent pathway. This decreases chondrocyte differentiation, thereby leading to the formation of enchondromas (10). Transgenic mice expressing the mutant PTHR1 under the control of the collagen type II promoter develop tumors that are similar to those observed in human enchondromatosis. Additional transgenic mice were generated that overexpress the Hedgehog (Hh) transcriptional regulator Gli2 because regulation of Ihh by PTHrP was found to be lost in these enchondromas. The mice developed ectopic cartilaginous islands similar to those observed in the mice expressing the mutant PTHR1. The Ihh signaling pathway plays a crucial role in the formation of enchondromatosis.


Cytogenetics and molecular genetics

There are few cytogenetic reports of benign enchondromas. There are no tumor-specific chromosomes or chromosomal regions associated with enchondromas, or chondrosarcomas (12-15).

Not much is known about the molecular mechanisms involved in the malignant transformation from enchondromas to chondrosarcomas. Expression of PTHR1, the PTHrP, and their downstream partner Bcl2 could be correlated with the grade of malignancy in chondrosarcoma (16-19). 


Diagnosis

The diagnosis of Ollier disease is based on clinical and radiological evaluations. Histological analysis has a limited role. It is used if malignancy is suspected. Other investigations, such as ultrasound, scintigraphy, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are not useful for establishing the diagnosis. They are useful for the evaluation and surveillance of lesions that become symptomatic i.e. cause pain or increase in size.


Differential diagnosis

Ollier disease has to be differentiated from HME (1-3). HME is an autosomal dominant disorder that is characterized by multiple bone tumors capped by cartilage which occur mostly in the metaphyses of long bones. Clinical and radiological criteria are used to establish the diagnosis of either disease. The most important criterion to distinguish enchondromas from osteochondromas as seen in HME is the localization of bone lesions. The osteochondromas are located at the bone surface and enchondromas are located in the center of bones. This allows radiographic distinction.

Other rare forms of chondromatosis, which include metachondromatosis, spondyloenchondroplasia, and genochondromatosis type I and II, have been described and defined well (1).


Treatment

There is no nonsurgical treatment for Ollier disease. Surgery is indicated when complications such as pathological fractures, growth defect, or malignant transformation occurs.


Prognosis

The prognosis of Ollier disease is usually difficult to assess (1). Patients with numerous lesions may have a better prognosis than patients with localized cartilaginous changes. These cartilaginous lesions can induce major shortening of a lower extremity and produce limb asymmetry, especially if already present in very young children. Early development of enchondromas in phalanges can lead to major finger deformities. Forms with an early onset are more severe. Neural compressions are less often observed than in HME. Enchondromas in Ollier disease can undergo malignant transformation into chondrosarcomas. This usually occurs in young adults. The reported incidence of malignant transformation is variable. It is estimated to occur in 5–50% of the cases (3,20-22). It is higher in Maffucci's syndrome. The prognosis is more severe than that in Ollier disease (1,2). Association of Ollier disease with other tumors has also been reported (1,23-25).


Conclusion

Enchondromas are common intraosseous, usually benign cartilaginous tumors. Its presentation is highly variable. It can range from an incidental finding to pathological fractures to limb length discrepancies. This variability can produce difficulty in making a diagnosis.  The management is complicated and must be determined based on several factors. The primary goals of surgery in this disease are the correction of deformity and prevention of malignancy. The surgical treatment involves curettage, bone grafting, and in the more severe cases limb-lengthening or amputation. 


References

  1. Maroteaux P, Le Merrer M. Les maladies osseuses de l'enfant. Paris: Médecine-Sciences, Flammarion; 2002. 

  2. Unni KK. Cartilaginous lesions of bone. J Orthop Sci. 2001;6:457–472. doi: 10.1007/s007760170015. 

  3. Whyte M. Acquired Disorders of Cartilage and Bone. Washington DC: American Society for Bone and Mineral Research; 2003.

  4. Fletcher CDM, Unni K, Mertens F, (Ed) World Health Organization Classification of Tumors Pathology and genetics Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone. Lyon: IARC Press; 2002. p. 427.

  5. Halal F, Azouz EM. Generalized enchondromatosis in a boy with only platyspondyly in the father. Am J Med Genet. 1991;38:588–592. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320380418. 

  6. Gabos PG, Bowen JR. Epiphyseal-metaphyseal enchondromatosis. A new clinical entity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:782–792.

  7. Loder RT, Sundberg S, Gabriel K, Mehbod A, Meyer C. Determination of bone age in children with cartilaginous dysplasia (multiple hereditary osteochondromatosis and Ollier's enchondromatosis) J Pediatr Orthop. 2004;24:102–108.

  8. Kronenberg HM. Developmental regulation of the growth plate. Nature. 2003;423:332–336. doi: 10.1038/nature01657. 

  9. Schipani E, Provot S. PTHrP, PTH, and the PTH/PTHrP receptor in endochondral bone development. Birth Defects Res Part C Embryo Today. 2003;69:352–362. doi: 10.1002/bdrc.10028.

  10. Hopyan S, Gokgoz N, Poon R, Gensure RC, Yu C, Cole WG, Bell RS, Juppner H, Andrulis IL, Wunder JS, Alman BA. A mutant PTH/PTHrP type I receptor in enchondromatosis. Nat Genet. 2002;30:306–310. doi: 10.1038/ng844.

  11. Rozeman LB, Sangiorgi L, Briaire-de Bruijn IH, Mainil-Varlet P, Bertoni F, Cleton-Jansen AM, Hogendoorn PC, Bovee JV. Enchondromatosis (Ollier disease, Maffucci syndrome) is not caused by the PTHR1 mutation p.R150C. Hum Mutat. 2004;24:466–473. doi: 10.1002/humu.20095.

  12. Bovee JV, Cleton-Jansen AM, Kuipers-Dijkshoorn NJ, van den Broek LJ, Taminiau AH, Cornelisse CJ, Hogendoorn PC. Loss of heterozygosity and DNA ploidy point to a diverging genetic mechanism in the origin of peripheral and central chondrosarcoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1999;26:237–246. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199911)26:3<237::AID-GCC8>3.0.CO;2-L. 

  13. Bovee JV, van Roggen JF, Cleton-Jansen AM, Taminiau AH, van der Woude HJ, Hogendoorn PC. Malignant progression in multiple enchondromatosis (Ollier's disease): an autopsy-based molecular genetic study. Hum Patho. 2000;31:1299–1303. doi: 10.1053/hupa.2000.19308. 

  14. Sandberg AA. Genetics of chondrosarcoma and related tumors. Curr Opin Oncol. 2004;16:342–354. doi: 10.1097/01.cco.0000129678.72521.e5.

  15. Sandberg AA, Bridge JA. Updates on the cytogenetics and molecular genetics of bone and soft tissue tumors: chondrosarcoma and other cartilaginous neoplasms. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2003;143:1–31. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4608(03)00002-5. 

  16. Amling M, Posl M, Hentz MW, Priemel M, Delling G. PTHrP and Bcl-2: essential regulatory molecules in chondrocyte differentiation and chondrogenic tumors. Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol. 1998;82:160–169. 

  17. Bovee JV, van den Broek LJ, Cleton-Jansen AM, Hogendoorn PC. Up-regulation of PTHrP and Bcl-2 expression characterizes the progression of osteochondroma towards peripheral chondrosarcoma and is a late event in central chondrosarcoma. Lab Invest. 2000;80:1925–1934. 

  18. Kunisada T, Moseley JM, Slavin JL, Martin TJ, Choong PF. Co-expression of parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) and PTH/PTHrP receptor in cartilaginous tumours: a marker for malignancy? Pathology. 2002;34:133–137. doi: 10.1080/003130201201117936. 

  19. Pateder DB, Gish MW, O'Keefe RJ, Hicks DG, Teot LA, Rosier RN. Parathyroid hormone-related Peptide expression in cartilaginous tumors. Clin Orthop. 2002:198–204.

  20. Rozeman LB, Hogendoorn PC, Bovee JV. Diagnosis and prognosis of chondrosarcoma of bone. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2002;2:461–472. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2.5.461. 

  21. Schaison F, Anract P, Coste F, De Pinieux G, Forest M, Tomeno B. Chondrosarcoma secondary to multiple cartilage diseases. Study of 29 clinical cases and review of the literature. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1999;85:834–845. 

  22. Schwartz HS, Zimmerman NB, Simon MA, Wroble RR, Millar EA, Bonfiglio M. The malignant potential of enchondromatosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:269–274. 

  23. Mahafza WS. Multiple enchondromatosis Ollier's disease with two primary brain tumors. Saudi Med J. 2004;25:1261–1263. 

  24. Tamimi HK, Bolen JW. Enchondromatosis (Ollier's disease) and ovarian juvenile granulosa cell tumor. Cancer. 1984;53:1605–1608. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840401)53:7<1605::AID-CNCR2820530731>3.0.CO;2-N. 

  25. Vaz RM, Turner C. Ollier disease (enchondromatosis) associated with ovarian juvenile granulosa cell tumor and precocious pseudopuberty. J Pediatr. 1986;108:945–947. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(86)80936-2.

Friday, 20 September 2024

 

         Blount Disease


                                    Dr. KS Dhillon


Introduction

Blount disease was first described by Walter Putnam Blount in 1937.

Blount disease is also known as tibia vara. It is an acquired genu varus deformity in children. It is caused by disruption of the normal cartilage growth at the proximal medial metaphysis of the tibia. This disease develops due to excessive compressive forces on the medial aspect of the proximal tibial physis. These forces lead to altered enchondral bone formation. Blount disease can be either unilateral or bilateral. It manifests in 2 forms i.e. infantile and adolescent. It is distinguished by variations in age of onset and presentation. The infantile or early-onset form is usually bilateral. It typically presents in children between the ages of 1 and 5 years. It tends to exacerbate after the initiation of walking. The adolescent form manifests itself at a later stage. It may be unilateral or bilateral.

The precise pathophysiology of the condition remains unclear. Obesity, early walking, and African-American heritage are recognized as risk factors for developing Blount disease. The severity of the disease can vary from articular cartilage irregularities to limb length discrepancies (1). Depending on the age and severity at presentation the treatment of Blount disease can vary from bracing to surgical interventions. The treatment options include knee-ankle-foot orthoses (KAFOs), hemiepiphysiodesis, and corrective proximal tibial osteotomies.

Radiographic findings are diagnostic. The Langenskiöld classification system describes the 6 radiographic stages of Blount disease. 



Etiology

Blount disease has a multifactorial etiology. Both biological and mechanical factors are involved. Mechanical overloading of the proximal tibia is a significant contributor, especially in children who are overweight and start walking early. It is however not the sole cause of the condition. The infantile form also affects normal-weight children. The infantile form and the higher prevalence among African-American patients indicate a potential hereditary component. Besides mechanical overload, genetic susceptibility is also implicated in the development of Blount disease.


Epidemiology

The prevalence of Blount disease in the USA is less than 1%. The infantile form is most common. It is more prevalent in males than females. In 80% of cases, infantile Blount disease is bilateral. Adolescent Blount disease is also known as adolescent genu varum. It is generally less severe and more likely to be unilateral. This disease is most prevalent among children of  Scandinavian and African ancestry.


Pathophysiology

Blount disease is caused by growth inhibition that is induced by excessive compressive forces. The compressive forces lead to cartilage damage and a subsequent delay in ossification. The mechanical overload leads to alteration in enchondral bone formation. When the compressive forces peak at the posteromedial aspect of the physis, there is heightened growth inhibition on the medial side of the knee. This leads to the development of a continual varus deformity (2).


Clinical Presentation

Genu varum is a normal finding in children below the age of 2 years. After that alignment transitions to valgus, reaching its peak around the age of 3 years. Persistent genu varum often serves as the initial indicator for diagnosis in children who are young and overweight (3). As this growth disorder progresses, knee deformities and associated abnormalities gradually worsen.  This results in a 3-dimensional deformity that combines varus, internal tibial rotation, procurvatum, and limb length discrepancy.

Infantile Blount Disease

Infantile Blount disease is usually seen in children between the ages of 1 and 3 years. It is usually bilateral and is characterized by varus deformity of the tibia and internal tibial torsion. Pain is usually uncommon. A palpable "beak" may be present over the medial aspect of the proximal tibial condyle.

There is a lateral thrust at the knee indicating lateral translation of the knee joint during weight-bearing. Irreversible asymmetric medial proximal tibial epiphysiodesis usually develops around the ages of 6 to 8 years. This makes conservative treatments ineffective. 

Adolescent Blount Disease

Adolescent Blount disease usually develops in children in their late childhood or early adolescence. It is often accompanied by pain in the medial aspect of the knee. This disease is usually associated with being obese or overweight. The presentation of the disease is usually unilateral. There may be associated abnormalities of the distal femur.


Evaluation

History, physical examination, and plain X-rays are sufficient to diagnose Blount disease. In the initial stages, a long-leg anteroposterior radiograph is used to measure the varus. For accurate measurement a bilateral projection of the radiograph from the hip to the ankle is necessary.

Indicators of Blount Disease

Findings suggestive of Blount disease include:

  • Medial beaking of the epiphysis

  • Irregular ossification

  • Medial slope of the epiphysis

  • Widened and irregular medial physis

  • Metaphysis in varus

Angles For Blount Disease Detection

Specific angle measurements are carried out to detect Blount disease in children. There are various angles, such as the Levine-Drennan angle, that are used to assess the relationship between the tibia shaft and its upper growth plate. An angle exceeding 11° indicates the presence of Blount disease. The angles for detection of Blount disease include: 

1. Metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle (MDA): This angle can predict the progression of Blount disease. The intersection occurs between a line drawn from the most distal point on the lateral and medial beaks of the tibial metaphysis to a line perpendicular to the long axis of the tibial diaphysis (4,5).

The disease progression can be predicted as follows:

An angle of more than 16° is associated with a 95% risk of deformity progression (4,5).        

An angle of less than 10° is likely physiological, with a 95% chance of spontaneous resolution (4,5).

An angle between 11° and 16° needs close observation for potential tibia vara progression (4,5).

The angular abnormalities include intra- and extra-articular varus malalignment, distal tibial valgus, lateral and medial laxity, internal tibial rotation, procurvatum, and distal femoral deformities (4,5).

2. Tibiofemoral angle: The tibiofemoral angle measures the severity of the varus deformity of the knee.

3. Medial metaphyseal beak angle: The medial metaphyseal beak angle (MMBA) is a potential diagnostic screening tool for patients at risk of Blount disease. When combined with the MDA, MMBA can confirm the diagnosis. This results in earlier diagnosis and improved patient outcomes.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assesses the menisci, cartilage,  ligaments, and vascularity of the physis. The MRI outperforms X-rays in detecting cartilaginous changes (6). Gadolinium-enhanced MRI is useful for pediatric patients with neglected or delayed forms of Blount disease observed after the age of 4 years but before the development of radiographic epiphysiodesis.


Langenskiöld Classification

Langenskiöld classified Blount disease into 6 stages. The stages indicate an increase in severity and medial physeal collapse. The staging is specifically applied to the infantile form. A physeal bar becomes evident from stage V onward. This occurs due to an injury or infection which causes disruption of normal cartilage in a growing physis. The healing process involves bone and not the cartilage. In skeletally immature children the physeal bars cause angular deformities and limb length discrepancies. MRI-based classifications, such as Fort-de-France (FDF), have become more prevalent recently. The x-ray-based classification however remains most widely used (7).

Stages of ligament laxity: There are 4 recognized stages of ligament laxity. These include:

  • Stage 0: Normal laxity

  • Stage +: Medial laxity 

  • Stage ++: Lateral laxity 

  • Stage +++: Multidirectional laxity 

Langenskiöld classification system: There are 6 stages of the Langenskiöld classification system (Fig 1). These include (7,8):

  • Stage I: Irregularity of metaphyseal zone 

  • Stage II: Medial metaphyseal beaking 

  • Stage III: Development of "step" in the metaphyseal beak

  • Stage IV: Epiphysis beaking that occupies a pit in the medial metaphysis

  • Stage V: Double epiphyseal plate

  • Stage VI: Bony bar formation


Fig 1




Management

The treatment of Blount's disease depends on the age of the child and severity of the deformity. The discrepancy between skeletal age and chronological age diminishes as the chronological age increases. A preoperative assessment of skeletal age is crucial as it can affect the timing and magnitude of the correction. When surgery is indicated, the surgical intervention aims to restore normal joint and limb alignment, achieve equal limb lengths at skeletal maturity, and prevent recurrence.

Brace

Children below the age of 4 years with Langenskiöld stage I or II disease

can be treated with KAFOs. The brace extends from the upper thigh to the foot and it applies valgus force to the knee. Orthotic treatment is successful when initiated before the age of 3 years in non-obese children who primarily wear the brace at night. The treatment continues for 1 year. In cases where orthoses do not prove effective, osteotomy has to be considered before age 4 when indicated. Fitting a brace on a boisterous child younger than 3 years of age poses a significant challenge that can affect treatment (9). Eighty percent of pediatric patients with progressive early-onset Blount disease undergoing surgical axis realignment before age 4 achieve a full recovery. The emergence of lateral thrust during weight-bearing indicates the onset of mechanical knee failure.

Guided Growth

Guided growth is obtained by hemiepiphysiodesis. It involves a surgical technique to correct angular limb deformities in skeletally immature patients. It is a good alternative to corrective osteotomies. Hemiepiphysiodesis is cost-effective, reduces pain for patients,  immobilization times are shorter, and surgical risks are diminished. 

The most commonly performed procedure is hemiepiphysiodesis of the lateral epiphysis with extraperiosteal implants such as pins, staples, or tension band plating. Bone growth stops or slows down on the side of epiphysiodesis.  The growth plate on the other side continues to grow normally and it gradually straightens the bone over time. The advantage of this approach is that the entire physis can resume growth after the hardware is removed. 

For this procedure to be successful the child should have at least 4 years of growth. The basis of this treatment modality is the Hueter-Volkmann principle, which posits that compression inhibits longitudinal growth. 

Unlike genu varum associated with other disorders, the outcome of guided growth in Blount disease is less predictable. This is potentially due to the involvement of the diseased proximal medial physis. In a study by Schroerlucke et al 8 hardware failures occurred in 18 Blount disease extremities representing a failure rate of 44% (10). Use of two parallel plates or non-cannulated solid stainless steel screws are recommended for patients with moderate-to-severe Blount disease (11). Hemiepiphysiodesis and guided-growth systems are viable options for individuals with late-onset Blount disease who present with a varus deformity of less than 15°, limb shortening not exceeding 1 cm, and having at least 2 years of skeletal growth. Surgical intervention is not appropriate for children 2 years and younger (12).

Osteotomy

In pediatric patients with documented and progressive Blount disease or FDF stage I who demonstrate risk factors, realignment osteotomy is typically performed before the age of 4 years (13). Due to high recurrence rate in infantile Blount disease, overcorrection osteotomies to achieve between 5º and 15° of valgus are necessary. There has to be lateral translation, 10° to 15° of lateral derotation, and 5° to 10° of valgus.

There are various osteotomy techniques described for Blount disease. These include opening and closing wedges, serrations, domes, opening wedges, and inclined osteotomies. The correction can be acute or gradual. 

Gradual correction produces a more precise mechanical axis and correction of leg length discrepancy. A systematic review by Feldman et al comparing acute versus gradual correction for Blount disease showed that gradual deformity correction is a more accurate treatment method of tibia vara than acute correction. No difference in the reoperation rate existed between the 2 procedures (14). With acute correction of the tibia vara, there is a risk of peroneal nerve injury and compartment syndrome regardless of the kind of osteotomy and fixation method used (15).



Acute Correction

The varus distal fragment is fixed in translation and external rotation to correct the internal rotation deformity during acute correction. Other surgical procedures that are necessary, such as medial plateau elevation and physeal bar resection, are carried out concurrently with the osteotomy. Hemiepiphysiodesis is appropriate if the bar is more than 50% of the size of the physis. The osteotomy level is positioned below the tibial tuberosity to prevent patella baja. Patella baja can lead to extensor insufficiency and knee pain.

Regardless of the stage of the disease, children who are 3 years or older, and patients with stage III Blount disease, irrespective of age, are considered suitable for an osteotomy. It can be challenging to accurately measure limb alignment after acute or gradual correction. Some researchers utilize intraoperative fluoroscopy with the electrocautery cord placed across the skin, overlaying the center of the hip and ankle to visualize mechanical axis alignment (16).

With acute correction, the deformity can be immediately corrected. This approach, however, increases the risk of compartment syndrome and peroneal nerve injury due to acute lengthening.

Gradual Correction

For gradual correction, an osteotomy is performed, and a frame is attached to enable progressive correction. Two commonly used devices include the Ilizarov Ring External Fixator or the Taylor Spatial Frame. Typically a treatment duration of 12 to 18 weeks is required. With gradual correction, the risk of neurovascular compromise and compartment syndrome is minimized while allowing for correction of deformity in all planes. A potential drawback is pin site infection.

Asymmetrical Physeal Distraction

Asymmetrical physeal distraction is a procedure that is rarely used. For asymmetrical physeal distraction 2 half-pins of 6 mm are inserted into the proximal tibial epiphysis and 2 pins into the diaphysis. Progressive distraction is then done at a rate of 1.5 mm per day. With the monolateral fixator, an average of 13° of angular correction can be obtained. This procedure is not so popular due to risks of septic arthritis, discomfort during distractions, and the potential for premature closure of the growth plate (17).

Physeal Bar Resection

Surgical resection is difficult because there is no distinct region of osseous tether in patients with Blount disease. Physeal bar resection aims to restore normal growth and prevent further deformity. There are improved outcomes in children who receive physeal bar resection or epiphysiolysis before the age of 7 years, combined with a valgus osteotomy. Children aged 7 years and older are not suitable for this surgery. Epiphysiolysis as a standalone procedure has minimal use in these patients (18,19). 

Medial Tibial Plateau Elevation

Progression of Blount disease can lead to lateral tibial translation and entry of the medial femoral condyle into the posteromedial depression. This can lead to a varus thrust gait. Children 6 years and older with severe Blount disease, at Langenskiöld stage V or VI, who exhibit a substantial posterior depression of the medial tibial plateau are suitable candidates for posteromedial tibial plateau elevation. To preserve the medial tibial plateau surgeons recommend conducting an intraepiphyseal or transepiphyseal osteotomy that hinges on the articular cartilage of the intercondylar notch. The aim should be to simultaneously correct the posterior depression of the medial plateau by incorporating a larger portion of the graft. To prevent the recurrence of a varus thrust gait, there is a need to perform lateral proximal tibial and fibular epiphyseodesis concurrently (20,21).


Differential Diagnosis

It can be challenging to distinguish infantile tibia vara from physiological bowing of the legs. In patients with physiological bowing, there is gradual curve development of both the tibia and femur. The proximal tibial bowing in Blount disease is acute. An MDA of more than 11° is indicative of Blount disease.

Other differential diagnoses include:

  • Rickets

  • Metaphyseal chondrodysplasia

  • Ollier disease

  • Proximal tibial physeal injury resulting from trauma, radiation, or infection Osteomyelitis

  • Thrombocytopenia absent radius syndrome

In Blount disease, there is asymmetrical beaking and sharp angular deformities, which are usually absent in rickets. The presence of multiple enchondromas indicates the existence of Ollier disease (22,23).


Prognosis

The prognosis for Blount disease depends on the age of the individual and also on the severity of the disease at the time of presentation. Infantile Blount disease usually has a favorable prognosis. There is a low deformity recurrence rate when the disease is treated early. Complete or partial regression can be achieved in patients in the early stages of the disease. Those in the later stages will most likely progress without early intervention. If left untreated, patients with the late-onset form of the disease may experience progression and significant joint deformity (24).


Complications

Complications associated with the treatment of Blount disease can be due to the disease itself or due to operative treatment. 

The operative complications include:

  • Vascular impairment

  • Wound infection

  • Pathologic fractures

  • Malalignment

Complications of the disease include (24):

  • Recurrence of deformity

  • Joint degeneration in the long-term

Adulkasem et al (25) in a retrospective cohort study of 58 patients with infantile Blount disease (101 extremities) who underwent tibial osteotomy found the following factors to be predictive of recurrence:

  • Age less than 42 months

  • LaMont classification type C

  • Medial metaphyseal beak angle of more than 128º


Conclusion

The initial treatment of Blount’s disease is leg bracing for patients below the age of 3 years. Surgery is often recommended if the deformity is not corrected before the age of 4 years and in patients with Langenskiӧld stage III or greater disease. For surgical correction of Blount’s disease, metaphyseal osteotomy remains a foundational treatment option. Many surgical techniques have been developed and used for the treatment of Blount’s disease. The best treatment for this disease, which can be accompanied by the best functional outcomes depends on the patient’s age, the severity of the deformity, psychosocial factors, and the experience of the doctor doing the treatment.



References

  1. Janoyer M. Blount disease. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Feb;105(1S):S111-S121.

  2. LANGENSKIOLD A. Aspects of the pathology of tibia vara (osteochondrosis deformans tibiae). Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn. 1955;44(1):58-63.

  3. Sabharwal S. Blount disease: an update. Orthop Clin North Am. 2015 Jan;46(1):37-47.

  4. Davids JR, Blackhurst DW, Allen BL. Radiographic evaluation of bowed legs in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001 Mar-Apr;21(2):257-63. 

  5. Park BK, Park KB, Kwak YH, Jin S, Kim HW, Park H. A comparative evaluation of tibial metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle changes between physiologic bowing and Blount disease. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(17):e15349.

  6. Gill KG, Nemeth BA, Davis KW. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pediatric knee. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2014 Nov;22(4):743-63. 

  7. Erkus S, Turgut A, Kalenderer O. Langenskiöld Classification for Blount Disease: Is It Reliable? Indian J Orthop. 2019 Sep-Oct; 53(5):662-664.

  8. Vosoughi F, Nabian MH, Simon AL, Aghaghazvini L, Zargarbashi R, Yekaninejad MS. Langenskiöld classification of tibia vara: a multicenter study on interrater reliability. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2022 Mar 01;31(2):114-119.

  9. Sabharwal S, Sabharwal S. Treatment of Infantile Blount Disease: An Update. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017 Sep;37 Suppl 2:S26-S31. 

  10. Schroerlucke S, Bertrand S, Clapp J, Bundy J, Gregg FO. Failure of Orthofix eight-Plate for the treatment of Blount disease. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Jan-Feb;29(1):57-60.

  11. Stitgen A, Garrels K, Kobayashi H, Vanderby R, McCarthy JJ, Noonan KJ. Biomechanical comparison between 2 guided-growth constructs. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Mar;32(2):206-9. 

  12. Sabharwal S. Blount disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jul;91(7):1758-76.

  13. Griswold B, Gilbert S, Khoury J. Opening Wedge Osteotomy for the Correction of Adolescent Tibia Vara. Iowa Orthop J. 2018;38:141-146. 

  14. Feldman DS, Madan SS, Ruchelsman DE, Sala DA, Lehman WB. Accuracy of correction of tibia vara: acute versus gradual correction. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6):794-8.

  15. Loder RT, Johnston CE. Infantile tibia vara. J Pediatr Orthop. 1987 Nov-Dec;7(6):639-46.

  16. S DMTS, Taqi M, De Leucio A. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Jan 9, 2024. Blount Disease. 

  17. de Pablos J, Franzreb M. Treatment of adolescent tibia vara by asymmetrical physeal distraction. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993 Jul;75(4):592-6.

  18. LANGENSKIOELD A, RISKA EB. TIBIA VARA (OSTEOCHONDROSIS DEFORMANS TIBIAE): A SURVEY OF SEVENTY-ONE CASES. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964 Oct;46:1405-20. 

  19. Andrade N, Johnston CE. Medial epiphysiolysis in severe infantile tibia vara. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006 Sep-Oct;26(5):652-8.

  20. van Huyssteen AL, Hastings CJ, Olesak M, Hoffman EB. Double-elevating osteotomy for late-presenting infantile Blount's disease: the importance of concomitant lateral epiphysiodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 May;87(5):710-5. 

  21. Accadbled F, Laville JM, Harper L. One-step treatment for evolved Blount's disease: four cases and review of the literature. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003 Nov-Dec;23(6):747-52.

  22. Bhattacharjee R, Chakraborty PP, Roy A, Biswas SN. Blount's disease: a rickets mimicker. BMJ Case Rep. 2016 May 13;2016.

  23. Birch JG. Blount disease. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013 Jul;21(7):408-18.

  24. Doyle BS, Volk AG, Smith CF. Infantile Blount disease: long-term follow-up of surgically treated patients at skeletal maturity. J Pediatr Orthop. 1996 Jul-Aug;16(4):469-76.

  25. Adulkasem N, Wongcharoenwatana J, Ariyawatkul T, Chotigavanichaya C, Eamsobhana P. A Predictive Score for Infantile Blount Disease Recurrence After Tibial Osteotomy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2023 Apr 1. 43 (4):e299-e304.